Jones v. Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
Filing
59
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 5/10/13 DISMISSING Plaintiff's catch-all damages claim WITH PREJUDICE; and the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to enter judgment of DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE on all claims and close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL R. JONES,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:11-CV-02799-MCE-CMK
v.
ORDER
OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMP.
PROGRAMS,
15
Defendant.
16
17
/
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
18
§ 522a(g)(1) to remedy alleged violations of the Privacy Act of 1974. On February 26, 2013, the
19
Court issued an order permitting Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (ECF
20
No. 56.) The order further specified: “If no amended pleading is filed within 30 days, the Court
21
will dismiss Plaintiff’s catch-all damages claim with prejudice and will direct the Clerk of the
22
Court to close this case.” In response, Plaintiff filed a document on March 25, 2013, indicating
23
that he would not be filing an amended complaint and, instead, stands on the original complaint,
24
which the Court dismissed with leave to amend (ECF No. 56) as to the catch-all damages claim.
25
(ECF No. 58.) Given Plaintiff’s March 25, 2013, response, the remaining catch-all damages
26
claim will be dismissed and this action will be closed.
1
1
2
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1.
3
4
Plaintiff’s catch-all damages claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE;
and
2.
5
The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment of DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE on all claims and close this case.
6
7
Date: May 10, 2013
8
_____________________________________
9
10
___________________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR., CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?