Gastile v. Virga et al

Filing 60

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 6/9/2015 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 58 are ADOPTED in FULL; Defendants' 56 motion to enforce the settlement agreement, is GRANTED; Defendants are directed to tender the filing fee for this action to the Clerk of the Court; Upon receipt of the filing fee, this action will be dismissed with prejudice. The dismissal with prejudice will constitute an adjudication on the merits. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

TIMOTHY L. GASTILE,

12

No. 2:11-cv-2829-JAM-EFB P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

T. VIRGA, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On February 10, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

20
21

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

22

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed

23

objections to the findings and recommendations.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this

24
25

court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire

26

file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

27

proper analysis.

28

/////
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. The findings and recommendations filed February 10, 2015, are adopted in full;

3

2. Defendants’ motion to enforce the settlement agreement, ECF No. 56, is granted;

4

3. Defendants are directed to tender the filing fee for this action to the Clerk of the Court;

5

4. Upon receipt of the filing fee, this action will be dismissed with prejudice. The

6
7
8
9
10

dismissal with prejudice will constitute an adjudication on the merits. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
So ordered
DATED: June 9, 2015
/s/ John A. Mendez_________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2