Driver v. Lopes et al
Filing
12
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/17/12 ORDERING that within 14 days from the filing date of this order, plaintiff shall, in the present action, file: (a) an amended complaint; or (b) a statement of voluntary dismissal, without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a). Failure of plaintiff to timely respond to this order shall result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
BILLY DRIVER, JR.,
11
Plaintiff,
12
13
No. 2:11-cv-2877 KJN P
vs.
MATTHEW A. LOPES, JR., et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
ORDER
/
16
On May 29, 2012, this court granted plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma
17
pauperis, and dismissed plaintiff’s complaint with leave to file an amended complaint within
18
thirty days. (See Dkt. No. 8.) On June 20, 2012, plaintiff filed a one-page statement listing each
19
of the three pending cases he has filed in this court, including the instant case. The purpose of
20
the statement is not apparent, and the deadline for filing an amended complaint in the present
21
action has expired.
22
In an abundance of caution, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
23
1. Within fourteen days from the filing date of this order, plaintiff shall, in the
24
present action, file: (a) an amended complaint; or (b) a statement of voluntary dismissal, without
25
prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a).
26
////
1
1
2
2. Failure of plaintiff to timely respond to this order shall result in the dismissal
of this action without prejudice, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
3
4
SO ORDERED.
DATED: July 17, 2012
5
6
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
driv2877.fta
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?