Smith-Lovejoy v. Smith's Food and Drug Stores
Filing
7
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS recommending that this action be dismissed without prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 2/6/12: F&R referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. Objections to F&R due within fourteen days. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ANDRE SMITH-LOVEJOY,
Plaintiff,
11
12
13
14
No. 2:11-cv-2878-GEB-JFM (PS)
vs.
SMITH’S FOOD & DRUG STORES,
Defendants.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
/
15
16
By an order filed December 23, 2011, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in
17
forma pauperis affidavit or pay the appropriate filing fees within twenty days and was cautioned
18
that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The twenty
19
day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed
20
a completed in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the appropriate filing fee.
21
22
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed
without prejudice.
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District
24
Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen
25
days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written
26
objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s
1
1
Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served
2
within fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file
3
objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order.
4
Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
5
DATED: February 6, 2012.
6
7
8
9
/014;smit2878.fifp
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?