Manago v. Cate et al
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/27/2012 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
11
STEWART MANAGO,
12
Plaintiff,
13
No. 2:11-cv-2891 AC P
vs.
14
MATTHEW CATE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
ORDER
/
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
18
§ 1983 and consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge. See Doc. Nos. 4 and 14. By
19
order filed on August 15, 2012, plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status was revoked as improvidently
20
granted and plaintiff was directed to pay the $350.00 filing fee in full within thirty days.
21
Plaintiff sought reconsideration. By order filed on November 2, 2012, the August 15th order
22
was affirmed. Plaintiff was granted an additional fourteen days to pay the filing fee in full, and
23
was cautioned that should he fail to do so, the instant action would be dismissed.
24
25
26
Plaintiff has failed to pay the filing fee in full, or otherwise respond to the court’s
order, and the time for doing so has expired.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without
1
1
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
2
DATED: November 27, 2012.
3
/s/
ALLISON CLAIRE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
AC:009
mana2891.ord5
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?