Whatley v. Bank of America, N.A. et al

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 12/14/11: Defendants shall have through and including January 11, 2012 to answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. (Kaminski, H)

1 STEVEN A. ELLIS (SBN 171742)
[e-mail]
2 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
601 S Figueroa St., 41st Floor
3 Los Angeles, California 90017
Tel.: [phone]
4 Fax: [phone]
5 MICHAEL J. MOLONEY III (SBN 259140)
[e-mail]
6 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
Three Embarcadero Center, 24th Floor
7 San Francisco, California 94111
Tel.: [phone]
8 Fax: [phone]
9 Attorneys for Defendants:
Bank of America, N.A.; BAC Home Loans
10 Servicing, LP; U.S. Bank National Association,
as Trustee for the Benefit of Harborview 200511 2 Trust Fund; and Mortgage Electronic
Registration Systems, Inc.
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SACRAMENTO DIVISION

16 JACK E. WHATLEY,

Case No. 2:11-cv-02901-MCE-GGH

17

ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR
DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE
PLEADING

18

Plaintiff,
v.

19 BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.; BAC HOME
LOANS SERVICING, LP; U.S. BANK
20 NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for
the Benefit of Harborview 2005-2 Trust Fund;
21 MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.; and
22 DOES 1 through 50, inclusive,
23

Courtroom:
Judge:

07
Hon. Morrison C. England, Jr.

Defendants.

24
25
26
27
28
LIBW/1808492.1

Order Extending Time for
Defendants to File Responsive Pleading

Case No. 2:11-cv-02901-MCE-GGH

ORDER

1

Upon consideration of the Parties’ Joint Stipulation Requesting Extension Of Time For

2

3 Defendants To Respond To Complaint Pursuant To Local Rule 144 (ECF No. 11), IT IS HEREBY
4 ORDERED as follows:
Defendants shall have through and including January 11, 2012 to answer or otherwise

5

6 respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8
9

Dated: December 14, 2011
__________________________________
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13

DEAC_Signature-END:

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LIBW/1808492.1

Order Extending Time for
Defendants to File Responsive Pleading

1
Case No. 2:11-cv-02901-MCE-GGH

PROOF OF SERVICE

1

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18
and not a party to the within action. My business address is 601 S Figueroa St., 41st Floor, Los
3 Angeles, CA 90017.
2

4

On December 14, 2011, I served the following documents by placing a true copy thereof
in a sealed envelope(s) on the persons below as follows:

5
[PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS TO FILE RESPONSIVE
6 PLEADING
7 John S. Sargetis
Stephen J. Foondos
8 UNITED LAW CENTER
3013 Douglas Blvd., Suite 200
9 Roseville, CA 95661
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Counsel for Plaintiff: Jack E. Whatley
Tel. [phone]
Fax. [phone]

(MAIL) I placed the envelope for collection and mailing, following our ordinary
business practices. I am readily familiar with this firm’s practice for collecting and
processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed
for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the
United States Postal Service, in a sealed envelope with postage fully prepaid. I am a
resident or employed in the county where the mailing occurred. The envelope or
package was placed in the mail at Los Angeles, California.
(OVERNIGHT DELIVERY) I deposited in a box or other facility regularly maintained
by Federal Express , an express service carrier, or delivered to a courier or driver
authorized by said express service carrier to receive documents, a true copy of the
foregoing document in sealed envelopes or packages designated by the express service
carrier, addressed as stated above, with fees for overnight delivery paid or provided for.
(CM/ECF Electronic Filing) I caused the above document(s) to be transmitted to the
office(s) of the addressee(s) listed above by electronic mail at the e-mail address(es) set
forth above pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P.5(d)(1). “A Notice of Electronic Filing (NEF) is
generated automatically by the ECF system upon completion of an electronic filing. The
NEF, when e-mailed to the e-mail address of record in the case, shall constitute the proof
of service as required by Fed.R.Civ.P.5(d)(1). A copy of the NEF shall be attached to
any document served in the traditional manner upon any party appearing pro se.”

21

I declare under penalty of perjury that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar
of this Court at whose direction this service was made and that the foregoing is true and correct.
22
Executed on December 14, 2011, at Los Angeles, California.
23
24
Gareth J. Oania
(Type or print name)

25

(Signature)

26
27

c4d6b0d3

28
LIBW/1808492.1

Joint Stipulation Pursuant to Local Rule 144(a)

1
Case No. 2:11-cv-02901-MCE-GGH