Maersk Line v. HS Trading Company, Inc.

Filing 9

IN ADMIRALTY JUDGMENT signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 2/17/2012 ADJUDGING that Maersk Line recover from HS Trading Company, Inc. the sum of $163,700.97 and post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a). CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G)

1
2
3
4

Stephen M. Uthoff, State Bar No. 145206
E-mail: [e-mail]
Uthoff Law Corporation
401 E. Ocean Blvd., Suite 710
Long Beach, California 90802
562-437-4301
fax [phone]

5
6
7

Attorneys for Plaintiff
MAERSK LINE

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

) Case No. 11-CV-02926 –WBS-CKD
)
) IN ADMIRALTY
Plaintiff,
)
) JUDGMENT
vs.
)
)
HS TRADING COMPANY, INC.
)
)
)
Defendant.
__________________________________ )

MAERSK LINE,

Pursuant to the Stipulation for Entry of Judgment filed herein:
IT IS ADJUDGED that Maersk Line recover from HS Trading Company, Inc. the
sum of $163,700.97 and post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961(a).

23
24

Dated: February 17, 2012

25
26
27
28

1

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

PROOF OF SERVICE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA

)
)
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES )

ss.

I am employed in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. I am over the age of 18
and not a party to the within action; my business address is 401 E. Ocean Blvd., Suite
710, Long Beach, California 90802.
On February 17, 2012 I served the foregoing document described as [PROPOSED]
JUDGMENT
on the interested parties as follows:

10
11
12
13

John L. Cammack
Michael & Cammack
Attorneys at Law
3247 W. March Lane, Suite 120
Stockton, CA 95219-2334

14
15
16
17
18

[x ] BY MAIL: I caused such envelope to be deposited in the mail at Long Beach,
California. The envelope was mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid. I am readily
familiar with this firm’s practice of collection and processing correspondence for mailing.
Under that practice it would be deposited with U.S. postal service on the same day with
postage thereon fully prepaid at Long Beach, California in the ordinary course of
business. I am aware that on motion of the party served, service is presumed invalid if
postal cancellation date or postage meter date is more than one day after date of deposit
for mailing in affidavit.

19
20
21
22
23

[] VIA CM/ECF: Pursuant to General Order 10-7 the forgoing document was served on
counsel via the Court’s CM/ECF system.
[X] Federal: I declare that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this
court at whose direction the service was made.
Executed on February 17, 2012, at Long Beach, California.

24
25

_s/Stephen M. Uthoff_______
Stephen M. Uthoff

26
27
28

2