Nagy v. Davey et al

Filing 34

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 9/1/15 ADOPTING IN FULL 32 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 31 Renewed Motion For Stay and Abeyance. Petitioner shall file a traverse, if any, in support of his exhausted claims within 30 days of the date of service of this order. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL NAGY, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:11-cv-2948 WBS DAD P v. ORDER D. DAVEY, et al., 15 Respondents. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 17 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate 19 Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 29, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 21 were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the 22 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has filed 23 objections to the findings and recommendations. In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 26 court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 27 analysis. 28 ///// 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 2 1. The findings and recommendations filed July 29, 2015, are adopted in full; 3 2. Petitioner’s motion to re-instate the stay of this action construed as a renewed motion 4 5 for a stay and abeyance (Doc. No. 31) is denied; and 3. Petitioner shall file a traverse, if any, in support of his exhausted claims within thirty 6 days of the date of service of this order. 7 Dated: September 1, 2015 8 9 10 /nagy2948.804hc 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?