Schneider v. Bank of America N.A et al
Filing
193
NOTICE OF LIS PENDENS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 4/21/2015. (Certified Copy Mailed to Plaintiff for filing in Amador County) (Donati, J)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10
CHRISTOPHER D. SCHNEIDER,
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
No. 2:11-cv-2953-JAM-EFB PS
Plaintiff,
v.
Notice of Lis Pendens
BANK OF AMERICA N.A.; BANK OF
AMERICA MORTGAGE, BANK OF
AMERICA HOME LOANS SERVICING
LP, BALBOA INSURANCE CO., HOME
RETENTION GROUP, QUALITY
RETENTION GROUP, QUALITY LOAN
SERVICE CORP., CLIFF COLER, DOES
1-40,
Defendants.
19
20
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that this action was commenced in the above-named court on
21
Monday November 7, 2011 by CHRISTOPHER D. SCHNEIDER against; BANK OF
22
AMERICA N.A., BANK OF AMERICA MORTGAGE, BANK OF AMERICA HOME LOANS
23
SERVICING LP, BALBOA INSURANCE COMPANY, HOME RETENTION GROUP,
24
QUALITY LOAN SERVICE CORP, FEDERAL HOME LOAN MORTGAGE
25
CORPORATION; and DOES 1 through 40, and is now pending.
26
The complaint alleges real property claims affecting real property located in Amador
27
County, California, commonly known as 16291 Stone Jug Rd. Sutter Creek, CA 95685, and
28
described as follows:
1
1
2
Parcel 1:
All that portion of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 19,
Township 7 North, Range 12 East, M.D.B.&M., that lies North of the Rancheria Road, as
the same existed on June 30, 1955.
3
5
Parcel 2:
A non-exclusive 50 foot easement for ingress, egress and utility purposes as conveyed by
Ivan Bowman recorded September 5, 1975 in Book 277 at page 684, Amador County
Official Records.
6
The property is designated as Parcel No. 030-010-012-000 in the Amador County
4
7
Assessor’s office.
8
9
Date: February 25, 2015
signature on original
_________________________________
CHRISTOPHER D. SCHNEIDER, Plaintiff pro per
10
11
12
Dated: April 21, 2015
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?