Arocha v. Sauceda et al
Filing
122
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/17/14 ordering that within 14 days plaintiff shall show cause why plaintiff should not be sanctioned and/or why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to file oppositions to defendants' pending motions. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RUDY AROCHA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2: 11-cv-2959 MCE KJN P
v.
ORDER
E. SAUCEDA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant
17
18
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 2, 2014, defendants Hart, Munoz and Rogel filed a motion for
19
summary judgment. (ECF No. 111.) On May 9, 2014, defendants Hart, Munoz and Rogel filed a
20
motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 114.)
On May 15, 2014, the undersigned granted plaintiff an extension of thirty days to file his
21
22
opposition to defendants’ summary judgment motion. (ECF No. 115.) On July 10, 2014, the
23
undersigned granted plaintiff’s request for a sixty days extension of time to file his oppositions to
24
defendants’ motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 119.) Sixty days
25
passed and plaintiff did not file his oppositions to these motions.
26
////
27
////
28
////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within fourteen days plaintiff shall show
2
cause why plaintiff should not be sanctioned and/or why this action should not be dismissed for
3
his failure to file oppositions to defendants’ pending motions.
4
Dated: September 17, 2014
5
6
Ar2959.osc(2)
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?