Arocha v. Sauceda et al
Filing
124
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/17/2014 RECOMMENDING that defendant Montanez be dismissed. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days.(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RUDY AROCHA,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:11-cv-2959 MCE KJN P
v.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
E. SAUCEDA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant
18
to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 13, 2013, the court granted plaintiff thirty days to submit the
19
forms necessary for service of defendant Montanez. (ECF No. 90.) Thirty days passed and
20
plaintiff did not return these forms.
21
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that defendant Montanez be dismissed.
22
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
23
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
24
after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
25
with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
26
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.”
27
////
28
////
1
1
Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the
2
right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
3
Dated: September 17, 2014
4
5
Ar2959.dis(m)
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?