Arocha v. Sauceda et al

Filing 25

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/30/12 ORDERING that plaintiffs second amended complaint 21 is DISMISSED with leave to file a third amended complaint within 30 days of the date of this order; if plaintiff does not file a third amended complaint, this action will proceed on the colorable claims contained in the first amended complaint. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUDY AROCHA, 11 12 13 Plaintiff, No. 2: 11-cv-2959 KJN P vs. E. SAUCEDA, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action 17 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s second amended complaint 18 filed April 16, 2012. (Dkt. No. 21.) For the following reasons, the second amended complaint is 19 dismissed. 20 On November 7, 2011, plaintiff filed the original complaint. (Dkt. No. 1.) On 21 December 9, 2011, the undersigned dismissed plaintiff’s original complaint with leave to amend. 22 (Dkt. No. 10.) In this order, the undersigned observed that plaintiff’s complaint was 47 pages 23 long. (Id. at 4.) The undersigned ordered that plaintiff’s amended complaint could be no longer 24 than 20 pages. (Id.) 25 26 On January 12, 2012, plaintiff filed an 18 page amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 13.) On January 25, 2012, the undersigned issued an order addressing the amended complaint. 1 1 (Dkt. No. 14.) The undersigned found that plaintiff had stated a colorable claim for violation of 2 the right to privacy against defendants Sauceda, Hart, Miranda and Munoz. (Id. at 10.) The 3 other claims were dismissed with thirty days to file a second amended complaint. (Id.) The 4 January 25, 2012 order stated, “[a]s with the first amended complaint, the undersigned orders that 5 the second amended complaint may be no longer than twenty pages.” (Id. at 10.) 6 On April 16, 2012, plaintiff filed a second amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 21.) 7 The second amended complaint is 42 pages long. Because the second amended complaint 8 exceeds the twenty page limit set in the previous orders, it is dismissed with leave to amend. 9 Plaintiff is granted thirty days to file a third amended complaint that does not exceed twenty 10 pages. If plaintiff does not file a third amended complaint, this action will proceed as to the 11 colorable claims contained in the first amended complaint. 12 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s second amended 13 complaint (Dkt. No. 21) is dismissed with leave to file a third amended complaint within thirty 14 days of the date of this order; if plaintiff does not file a third amended complaint, this action will 15 proceed on the colorable claims contained in the first amended complaint. 16 DATED: May 30, 2012 17 18 _____________________________________ KENDALL J. NEWMAN UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 19 20 ar2959.ord 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?