Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, et al., v. Glaser et al

Filing 14

JOINT STIPULATION and ORDER as to Defendant San Luis & Delta Mendota Water Authority signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/1/2011 GRANTING an Extension of Time to file an Answer to the 2 Complaint. Answer due by 1/9/2012. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 JOSEPH W. COTCHETT (SBN 36324) jcotchett@cpmlegal.com PHILIP L. GREGORY (SBN 95217) pgregory@cpmlegal.com ERIC J. BUESCHER (SBN 271323) ebuescher@cpmlegal.com COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP San Francisco Airport Office Center 840 Malcolm Road Burlingame, California 94010 Telephone: (650) 697-6000 Facsimile: (650) 697-0577 DIANE V. RATHMANN (SBN 89845) drathmann@aol.com LINNEMAN, BURGESS, TELLES, VAN ATTA, VIERRA, RATHMANN, WHITEHURST & KEENE 1820 Marguerite Street P.O. Box 156 Dos Palos, CA 93620 Telephone: (209) 392-2141 Facsimile: (209) 392-3964 Attorneys for Defendant San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority 15 STEPHAN C. VOLKER (SBN 63093) svolker@volkerlaw.com JOSHUA A. H. HARRIS (SBN 226898) jharris@volkerlaw.com JAMEY M.B. VOLKER (SBN 273544) jvolker@volkerlaw.com M. BENJAMIN EICHENBERG (SBN 270893) mbeichenberg@yahoo.com LAW OFFICES OF STEPHAN C. VOLKER 436 14th Street, Suite 1300 Oakland, California 94612 Telephone: (510) 496-0600 Facsimile: (510) 496-1366 Attorneys for Plaintiffs Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations; California Sportfishing Protection Alliance; Friends of the River; San Francisco Crab Boat Owners Association, Inc.; The Institute for Fisheries Resources; and Felix Smith IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 20 21 PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN’S ASSOCIATIONS; CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE; FRIENDS OF THE RIVER; SAN FRANCISCO CRAB BOAT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.; THE INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES; and FELIX SMITH, 22 23 24 25 26 27 v Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:11-cv-2980-KJM (CKD) JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER v. DONALD R. GLASER, Regional Director of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation; U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, and SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, Judge: Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller Defendants. 28 LAW OFFICES COTCHETT, PITRE, & MCCARTHY, LLP JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER; Case No. 2:11-cv-2980-KJM (CKD) 1 2 STIPULATION WHEREAS, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, California 3 Sportfishing Protection Alliance, Friends of the River; San Francisco Crab Boat Owners 4 Association, Inc., The Institute for Fisheries Resources, and Felix Smith (collectively, 5 “Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint in the above-entitled case against defendants Donald R. 6 Glaser, Regional Director of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, the U.S. Bureau of 7 Reclamation (the “Federal Defendants”), and the San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water 8 Authority (the “Authority,” and, together with the Federal Defendants, “Defendants”); 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 WHEREAS, the Federal Defendants’ response to the Complaint is currently due on January 9, 2012; WHEREAS, the Authority’s response to the Complaint is currently due on December 5, 2011; WHEREAS, the initial case management conference is currently scheduled for March 21, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. before this Court; WHEREAS, there are no other currently scheduled deadlines or hearings in this matter; WHEREAS, there have been no previous requests for an extension of time to 18 respond to the Complaint by any party, nor have there been any other requests for 19 extensions of time with respect to any other matter; 20 21 WHEREAS, the Federal Defendants have no objection to the requested extension of time for the Authority to respond to the Complaint; 22 WHEREAS, counsel for the Authority has met and conferred with counsel for 23 Plaintiffs regarding the date by which a responsive pleading to the Complaint must be 24 filed; and, 25 26 litigation to have the same deadline for all Defendants to file responsive pleadings to the 27 v WHEREAS, it will conserve resources and increase efficient management of this Complaint in order to avoid duplicative motion(s) and/or hearings on similar issues. 28 LAW OFFICES COTCHETT, PITRE, & MCCARTHY, LLP JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER; Case No. 2:11-cv-2980-KJM (CKD) 1 1 2 3 4 5 THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, SUBJECT TO COURT ORDER, THAT: Defendant San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority shall have up to and including January 9, 2012 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 6 7 Dated: November 28, 2011 8 COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP By: 9 10 11 Dated: November 28, 2011 /s/ Eric J. Buescher ERIC J. BUESCHER Attorneys for Defendant San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority LAW OFFICES OF STEPHAN C. VOLKER 12 13 14 By: /s/ Stephan C. Volker STEPHAN C. VOLKER Attorneys for Plaintiffs 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 v 28 LAW OFFICES COTCHETT, PITRE, & MCCARTHY, LLP JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER; Case No. 2:11-cv-2980-KJM (CKD) 2 1 2 ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation, Defendant San Luis & Delta Mendota Water Authority, 3 shall have up to and including January 9, 2012 to answer or otherwise respond to the 4 Complaint. 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 DATED: December 1, 2011. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 v 28 LAW OFFICES COTCHETT, PITRE, & MCCARTHY, LLP JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER; Case No. 2:11-cv-2980-KJM (CKD) 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?