Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, et al., v. Glaser et al
Filing
14
JOINT STIPULATION and ORDER as to Defendant San Luis & Delta Mendota Water Authority signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 12/1/2011 GRANTING an Extension of Time to file an Answer to the 2 Complaint. Answer due by 1/9/2012. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
JOSEPH W. COTCHETT (SBN 36324)
jcotchett@cpmlegal.com
PHILIP L. GREGORY (SBN 95217)
pgregory@cpmlegal.com
ERIC J. BUESCHER (SBN 271323)
ebuescher@cpmlegal.com
COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP
San Francisco Airport Office Center
840 Malcolm Road
Burlingame, California 94010
Telephone: (650) 697-6000
Facsimile:
(650) 697-0577
DIANE V. RATHMANN (SBN 89845)
drathmann@aol.com
LINNEMAN, BURGESS, TELLES,
VAN ATTA, VIERRA, RATHMANN,
WHITEHURST & KEENE
1820 Marguerite Street
P.O. Box 156
Dos Palos, CA 93620
Telephone: (209) 392-2141
Facsimile:
(209) 392-3964
Attorneys for Defendant San Luis &
Delta-Mendota Water Authority
15
STEPHAN C. VOLKER (SBN 63093)
svolker@volkerlaw.com
JOSHUA A. H. HARRIS (SBN 226898)
jharris@volkerlaw.com
JAMEY M.B. VOLKER (SBN 273544)
jvolker@volkerlaw.com
M. BENJAMIN EICHENBERG (SBN 270893)
mbeichenberg@yahoo.com
LAW OFFICES OF STEPHAN C. VOLKER
436 14th Street, Suite 1300
Oakland, California 94612
Telephone: (510) 496-0600
Facsimile:
(510) 496-1366
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Pacific Coast Federation
of Fishermen’s Associations; California
Sportfishing Protection Alliance; Friends of the
River; San Francisco Crab Boat Owners
Association, Inc.; The Institute for Fisheries
Resources; and Felix Smith
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
16
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
17
18
19
20
21
PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF
FISHERMEN’S ASSOCIATIONS;
CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING
PROTECTION ALLIANCE; FRIENDS OF
THE RIVER; SAN FRANCISCO CRAB
BOAT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.;
THE INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES
RESOURCES; and FELIX SMITH,
22
23
24
25
26
27
v
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 2:11-cv-2980-KJM (CKD)
JOINT STIPULATION AND
REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF
TIME FOR DEFENDANT SAN
LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA
WATER AUTHORITY TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT;
ORDER
v.
DONALD R. GLASER, Regional Director of
the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation; U.S.
BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, and SAN
LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER
AUTHORITY,
Judge: Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller
Defendants.
28
LAW OFFICES
COTCHETT,
PITRE, &
MCCARTHY, LLP
JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT;
ORDER; Case No. 2:11-cv-2980-KJM (CKD)
1
2
STIPULATION
WHEREAS, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, California
3
Sportfishing Protection Alliance, Friends of the River; San Francisco Crab Boat Owners
4
Association, Inc., The Institute for Fisheries Resources, and Felix Smith (collectively,
5
“Plaintiffs”) filed a Complaint in the above-entitled case against defendants Donald R.
6
Glaser, Regional Director of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, the U.S. Bureau of
7
Reclamation (the “Federal Defendants”), and the San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water
8
Authority (the “Authority,” and, together with the Federal Defendants, “Defendants”);
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
WHEREAS, the Federal Defendants’ response to the Complaint is currently due
on January 9, 2012;
WHEREAS, the Authority’s response to the Complaint is currently due on
December 5, 2011;
WHEREAS, the initial case management conference is currently scheduled for
March 21, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. before this Court;
WHEREAS, there are no other currently scheduled deadlines or hearings in this
matter;
WHEREAS, there have been no previous requests for an extension of time to
18
respond to the Complaint by any party, nor have there been any other requests for
19
extensions of time with respect to any other matter;
20
21
WHEREAS, the Federal Defendants have no objection to the requested extension
of time for the Authority to respond to the Complaint;
22
WHEREAS, counsel for the Authority has met and conferred with counsel for
23
Plaintiffs regarding the date by which a responsive pleading to the Complaint must be
24
filed; and,
25
26
litigation to have the same deadline for all Defendants to file responsive pleadings to the
27
v
WHEREAS, it will conserve resources and increase efficient management of this
Complaint in order to avoid duplicative motion(s) and/or hearings on similar issues.
28
LAW OFFICES
COTCHETT,
PITRE, &
MCCARTHY, LLP
JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT;
ORDER; Case No. 2:11-cv-2980-KJM (CKD)
1
1
2
3
4
5
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, SUBJECT TO COURT ORDER,
THAT:
Defendant San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority shall have up to and
including January 9, 2012 to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
6
7
Dated: November 28, 2011
8
COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP
By:
9
10
11
Dated: November 28, 2011
/s/ Eric J. Buescher
ERIC J. BUESCHER
Attorneys for Defendant San Luis &
Delta-Mendota Water Authority
LAW OFFICES OF STEPHAN C. VOLKER
12
13
14
By:
/s/ Stephan C. Volker
STEPHAN C. VOLKER
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
v
28
LAW OFFICES
COTCHETT,
PITRE, &
MCCARTHY, LLP
JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT;
ORDER; Case No. 2:11-cv-2980-KJM (CKD)
2
1
2
ORDER
Pursuant to the stipulation, Defendant San Luis & Delta Mendota Water Authority,
3
shall have up to and including January 9, 2012 to answer or otherwise respond to the
4
Complaint.
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
DATED: December 1, 2011.
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
v
28
LAW OFFICES
COTCHETT,
PITRE, &
MCCARTHY, LLP
JOINT STIPULATION AND REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR DEFENDANT
SAN LUIS & DELTA-MENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT;
ORDER; Case No. 2:11-cv-2980-KJM (CKD)
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?