Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, et al., v. Glaser et al

Filing 182

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 8/30/17, ORDERING this case DISMISSED with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii). CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 STEPHAN C. VOLKER (SBN 63093) STEPHANIE L. CLARKE (SBN 254548) DANIEL P. GARRETT-STEINMAN (SBN 69146) JAMEY M.B. VOLKER (SBN 273544) Law Offices of Stephan C. Volker 1633 University Avenue Berkeley, California 94703 Tel: 510/496-0600 Fax: 510/845-1255 Attorneys for Plaintiffs JOSEPH W. COTCHETT (SBN 36234) PHILIP L. GREGORY (SBN 95217) ERIC J. BUESCHER (SBN 271323) COTCHETT, PITRE & MCCARTHY, LLP 840 Malcolm Road Burlingame, CA 94010 Tel: 650/697-6000 Fax: 650/697-0577 Attorneys for Defendant San Luis & DeltaMendota Water Authority 14 JEFFREY H. WOOD Acting Assistant Attorney General U.S. Department of Justice Environment & Natural Resources Division MARTIN F. McDERMOTT PAUL CIRINO Environmental Defense Section, P.O. Box 7611 Washington, D.C. 20044-7611 Tel: 202/514-1542 Attorneys for Defendants David Murillo and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation 15 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 PACIFIC COAST FEDERATION OF FISHERMEN’S ASSOCIATIONS, CALIFORNIA SPORTFISHING PROTECTION ALLIANCE, FRIENDS OF THE RIVER, SAN FRANCISCO CRAB BOAT OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., THE INSTITUTE FOR FISHERIES RESOURCES, and FELIX SMITH, Civ. No. 2:11-cv-02980-KJM-CKD STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) Trial Date: September 11, 2017 Plaintiffs, Hon. Kimberly J. Mueller v. DAVID MURILLO, Regional Director of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, U.S. BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, and SAN LUIS & DELTAMENDOTA WATER AUTHORITY, Defendants. 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE -1- 2:11-cv-02980-KJM-CKD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Plaintiffs, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, California Sportfishing Protection Alliance, Friends of the River, the Institute for Fisheries Resources, and Felix Smith; and Defendants, David Murillo, U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, and San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority (collectively with Plaintiffs, the “Parties”), hereby file this Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice of the sole remaining claim in Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, and request that the Court enter final judgment in favor of Defendants on Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). WHEREAS, on September 16, 2013, the Court issued an Order dismissing Plaintiffs’ Complaint with leave to amend (Dkt. 70); WHEREAS, on October 7, 2013, Plaintiffs filed the currently operative First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 71); WHEREAS, on March 28, 2014 the Court issued an order granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint (Dkt. 87); WHEREAS, on September 2, 2016, the Court issued an order denying Plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment and granting in part and denying in part Defendants’ motions for summary judgment (Dkt. 138); WHEREAS, on March 28, 2017, the Court issued an order denying Plaintiffs’ motion for leave to file a Second Amended Complaint (Dkt. 162); WHEREAS, on March 28, 2017, the Court issued a Final Pretrial Order (Dkt. 163); WHEREAS, on August 9, 2017, the Court issued an order denying Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration (Dkt. No. 175); WHEREAS, on August 25, 2017, the Court issued an order tentatively striking as irrelevant the majority of Plaintiffs’ disputed facts listed in the Final Pretrial Order (Dkt. 180); WHEREAS, trial is currently set to begin on September 11, 2017 (Dkt. 176.); WHEREAS, pursuant to the above orders, the sole issue remaining for trial is whether discharges unrelated to crop production from subsurface drainage systems beneath the Vega Solar 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE -2- 2:11-cv-02980-KJM-CKD 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Project make up a majority of discharges from the Grassland Bypass Project (the “Vega Claim”) (see Dkt. 163 at 2, 4); WHEREAS, Plaintiffs are unlikely to succeed on the Vega Claim because the discharges from the Vega Solar Project property do not make up a majority of discharges from the Grassland Bypass Project; WHEREAS, with the exception of the Vega Claim, the court has dismissed all other claims in this suit; and, WHEREAS, Plaintiffs have informed Defendants they plan to file an appeal of the final judgment in this matter. THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii) that Plaintiffs’ Vega Claim be dismissed with prejudice, and that the Court issue final judgment in favor of Defendants on Plaintiffs’ First Amended Complaint. Accordingly, all previously set deadlines and hearings are VACATED. This case is CLOSED. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated this 29th day of August, 2017. 17 LAW OFFICES OF STEPHAN C. VOLKER 18 By: /s/ Stephan C. Volker___ STEPHAN C. VOLKER Attorney for Plaintiffs Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s Associations, et al. 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: August 29, 2017 JEFFREY H. WOOD Acting Assistant Attorney General By: /s/ Paul Cirino PAUL CIRINO Environmental Defense Section Ben Franklin Station, P.O. Box 7611 Washington, DC 20044-7611 Attorneys for Defendants David Murillo and U.S. Bureau of Reclamation STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE -3- 2:11-cv-02980-KJM-CKD 1 2 3 Dated: August 29, 2017 COTCHETT, PITRE & McCARTHY, LLP By: /s/ Eric J. Buescher ERIC J. BUESCHER 4 5 LINNEMAN LAW LLP 6 DIANE V. RATHMANN 7 Attorneys for Defendant San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority 8 9 10 IT IS SO ORDERED. 11 12 DATED: August 30, 2017. 13 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE -4- 2:11-cv-02980-KJM-CKD

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?