Johnson v. The Solano Computer Guy, Inc. et al

Filing 13

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge William B. Shubb on 2/2/2012 12 ORDERING that Defendants John S. Holm; Leone E. Holm shall have until 2/15/2012 to respond to complaint. (Reader, L)

4

SCOTT N. JOHNSON, ESQ., SBN 166952
DISABLED ACCESS PREVENTS INJURY, INC.
5150 FAIR OAKS BLVD., SUITE 101
PMB #253
CARMICHAEL, CA 95608-5758
TELEPHONE [phone]
FAX [phone]
E-MAIL [e-mail]

5

Attorney for Plaintiff Scott N. Johnson

1
2
3

6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

)
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
The Solano Computer Guy, Inc., )
)
et al
)
)
Defendants
)
)
)
Scott N. Johnson

Case No.2:11-cv-02982-WBS-EFB
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
RE: EXTENSION OF TIME UNTIL
FEBRUARY 15, 2012 FOR
DEFENDANTS JOHN S. HOLM; LEONE
E. HOLM TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

20
21

Pursuant

to

Local

Rule

6-144

(a),

Plaintiff

Scott

N.

22

Johnson and Defendants, John S. Holm; Leone E. Holm, by and

23

through

their

respective

attorneys

of

record,

Scott

N.

24

Johnson; Stephanie M. Leifer, stipulate as follows:
25
26
27
28

1. An extension of time has been previously
obtained for Defendants John S. Holm; Leone E.

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 1

Holm until January 30, 2012 to respond or
1
2

otherwise plead reference to Plaintiff’s

3

complaint.

4

2. Defendants John S. Holm; Leone E. Holm are

5

granted an extension until February 15, 2012 to
6

respond or otherwise plead reference to
7

Plaintiff’s complaint.

8
9

3. Defendants John S. Holm; Leone E. Holm response

10

will be due no later than February 15, 2012.

11
12

IT IS SO STIPULATED effective as of February 1, 2012

13
14

Dated:

February 1, 2012

/s/Stephanie M. Leifer__

15

Stephanie M. Leifer,
16
17

Attorney for Defendants

18

John S. Holm; Leone E.

19

Holm

20
21

Dated:

February 1, 2012

/s/Scott N. Johnson ____

22
23
24

Scott N. Johnson,
Attorney for Plaintiff

25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 2

1

IT IS SO ORDERED: that Defendants John S. Holm; Leone

2

E. Holm shall have until February 15, 2012 to respond to

3

complaint.

4
5

Dated: February 2, 2012

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER RE: EXTENSION OF TIME - 3