Trullson v. County of San Joaquin District Attorneys Office
Filing
199
ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/14/15 GRANTING 196 Motion to Exonerate Supersedeas Bond. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JANIS TRULSSON,
12
13
14
15
16
17
No. 2:11-CV-02986 KJM DAD
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN DISTRICT
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE,
Defendant.
This matter is before the court on defendant’s motion to exonerate the supersedeas
18
bond. (ECF No. 196.) Plaintiff has filed a statement of non-opposition. (ECF No. 198.) The
19
court hereby GRANTS defendant’s motion, and the said bond is hereby EXONERATED.
20
Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 62(d), a stay of a monetary judgment may
21
be obtained by posting a supersedeas bond. Under Local Rule 151(d), “a supersedeas bond shall
22
be 125 percent of the amount of the judgment unless the Court otherwise orders.” When “the
23
purpose of the supersedeas bond has been fulfilled,” the court can exonerate it. See Ministry of
24
Def. & Support for the Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran v. Cubic Def. Sys., Inc., No.
25
98-1165, 2012 WL 2152068, at *3 (S.D. Cal. June 12, 2012).
26
Here, the purpose of the supersedeas bond has been fulfilled. On October 22,
27
2014, defendant filed a notice of appeal of the judgment in this case. (ECF No. 187.) On the
28
same day, defendant also filed a notice of posting supersedeas bond in the amount of $3,177,028.
1
1
(ECF No. 188.) On March 27, 2015, defendant filed a notice of satisfaction of judgment. (ECF
2
No. 195.) On March 31, 2015, the Ninth Circuit dismissed defendant’s appeal by granting
3
defendant’s motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 197.) Accordingly, because the “obligations secured
4
by the supersedeas bond have been satisfied,” the court GRANTS defendant’s motion. This order
5
resolves ECF No. 196.
6
7
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: May 14, 2015.
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?