Novikoff v. United States
Filing
35
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 7/18/13 ORDERING that Defendat's MOTION for SUMMARY JUDGMENT 34 shall be calendared for hearing on 8/22/13. That Defendants motion be briefed on the following schedule: Defendant's Motion and supporting papers: 7/18/13, Plaintiff's Opposition: 8/8/13; Defendant's Reply: 8/15/13.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
GREGORY T. BRODERICK
Assistant United States Attorneys
501 I Street, Suite 10-100
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone: (916) 554-2700
Facsimile: (916) 554-2900
Attorneys for Defendant
United States of America
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
JOHN NAVY NOVIKOFF
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-03023-MCE -EFB
Plaintiff,
v.
STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR
DEFEDNANT’S MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
[Local Rule 143]
16
17
18
WHEREAS, this Court’s Scheduling Order [Dkt. No. 11] requires any motion for summary
19
judgment to be filed 8 weeks before a hearing, the opposition and any cross-motion to be filed 5
20
weeks before a hearing, the opposition to any cross-motion and reply regarding the motion to be
21
filed 3 weeks before a hearing; and any reply regarding the cross-motion to be filed one week before
22
the hearing date;
23
24
WHEREAS, Defendant wishes to file a motion for summary judgment on an issue on which
Plaintiff does not wish to cross-move;
25
WHEREAS, the parties have a fundamental disagreement on this issue underlying
26
Defendant’s proposed summary judgment motion, which could be dispositive of the case;
27
WHEREAS, an order from the Court deciding Defendant’s motion is likely to aid in
28
resolution of this case;
29
Stipulation Setting Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule
30
1
1
NOW WHEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AS FOLLOWS:
2
That Defendant’s motion for summary judgment shall be calendared for hearing on August
3
22, 2013;1
That Defendant’s motion be briefed on the following schedule:
4
5
• Defendant’s Motion and supporting papers:
• Plaintiff’s Opposition:
• Defendant’s Reply:
6
7
July 18, 2013
August 8, 2013;
August 15, 2013.
8
Nothing herein is intended to prohibit any party from filing any such motion according to the
9
schedule set forth in the operative Scheduling Order.
10
Respectfully Submitted,
11
12
DATED: July 5, 2013
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney
13
By:
/s/ Gregory T. Broderick
GREGORY T. BRODERICK
Assistant United States Attorney
14
15
16
17
DATED: July 5, 2013
/s/ Joseph E. Maloney
Attorney for Plaintiff
18
IT IS SO ORDERED.
19
20
Dated: July 18, 2013
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
1
The parties recognize that the Court retains the discretion to submit this matter without argument,
or to continue the hearing to another date.
Stipulation Setting Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?