Batton v. McEntire et al

Filing 58

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 4/3/13 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice; and pursuant to its terms, the court shall retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the parties Settlement Agreement. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MARIO BATTON,

12

Plaintiff,

13

vs.

14

No. CIV S-11-3084 DAD P

McENTIRE, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

ORDER
/

17

On March 13, 2013, a confidential telephone call between plaintiff and Magistrate

18

Judge Craig M. Kellison took place to ascertain the current status of settlement discussions

19

between the parties. As a result of that communication, the court learned that the parties have in

20

fact reached a settlement in this action, the terms of which are summarized in the Settlement

21

Agreement attached as Exhibit A to the parties recently-filed stipulation to dismiss this case. The

22

undersigned has received and reviewed the stipulation signed by all parties.

23

/////

24

/////

25

/////

26

/////
1

1

`

Pursuant to that stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1. This action is dismissed with prejudice; and

3

2. Pursuant to its terms, the court shall retain jurisdiction over enforcement of the

4

parties’ Settlement Agreement.

5

DATED: April 3, 2013.

6
7
8

DAD:9
batt3084.stip

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2