Florence v. Nangalama et al
Filing
115
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 7/17/2017 DENYING AS MOOT 114 Motion. (Henshaw, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
DAVID FLORENCE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:11-cv-3119 GEB KJN P
v.
ORDER
E. COLTER,
15
Defendant.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se. On July 9, 2017, plaintiff filed a request to
17
18
participate in the July 13, 2017 settlement conference by video conference, but that if he is
19
required to appear in person, the court issue an order directing the North Kern State Prison
20
(“NKSP”) Warden to (a) release plaintiff immediately into general population without going
21
through orientation; (b) return plaintiff to his prior cell; and (c) return plaintiff to his prior job
22
assignment. However, plaintiff’s request was not received by the court until July 13, 2017, and
23
entered on the court’s docket on July 14, 2017. Thus, plaintiff’s request is now moot as the
24
settlement conference has been completed.1
25
////
26
27
28
1
Moreover, the court is without jurisdiction to issue orders to the warden at NKSP. The instant
action proceeds solely as to defendant Colter based on an incident that occurred at California
State Prison, Sacramento, on March 23, 2011, and plaintiff is no longer housed at NKSP.
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 114) is denied
2
as moot.
3
Dated: July 17, 2017
4
5
6
/flor3119.den
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?