Florence v. Nangalama et al

Filing 20

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/22/2013 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

DAVID FLORENCE,

11
12
13
14

Plaintiff,
vs.
A.W. NANGALAMA, et al.,
Defendants.

15
16

No. 2:11-cv-03119 GEB JFM (PC)

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
/

By an order filed April 3, 2012 (ECF 19), this court ordered plaintiff to complete

17

and return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on

18

defendants. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way

19

to the court’s order.

20
21
22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed
without prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

23

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

24

fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file

25

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings

26

and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within
1

1

fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

2

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

3

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

4

DATED: May 22, 2013

5
6

_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

7
8

flor3119.fusm(2)

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2