Florence v. Nangalama et al

Filing 8

ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge John F. Moulds on 2/16/12 ORDERING that the Clerk assign a district judge to this case; it is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr.; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

DAVID FLORENCE,
Plaintiff,

11
12
13
14

vs.
A.W. NANGALAMA, et al.,

ORDER AND

Defendants.

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS
/

15
16

No. 2:11-cv-3119-JFM (PC)

By an order filed December 23, 2011, this court ordered plaintiff to complete and

17

return to the court, within thirty days, the USM-285 forms necessary to effect service on

18

defendants. That thirty day period has since passed, and plaintiff has not responded in any way

19

to the court’s order.

20
21
22
23
24

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall assign
a district judge to this case; and
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without
prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States

25

District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within

26

fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file
1

1

written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings

2

and Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within

3

fourteen days after service of the objections. Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections

4

within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v.

5

Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).

6

DATED: February 16, 2012.

7
8
9
10

/014;flor3119.fusm

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2