Meyer Manufacturing Company Limited v. Telebrands Corp.
Filing
74
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 3/4/2013 ORDERING Motions 65 , 67 , 68 , 71 , Hearing Reset for 4/8/2013 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 (LKK) before Judge Lawrence K. Karlton. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
MENNEMEIER, GLASSMAN & STROUD LLP
Andrew W. Stroud (SBN 240236)
980 9th Street, Suite 1700
Sacramento, CA 95814-2736
Telephone: 916-553-4000
Facsimile: 916-553-4011
Email: stroud@mgslaw.com
OF COUNSEL:
COOPER & DUNHAM LLP
Peter D. Murray (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Robert T. Maldonado (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Hindy Dym (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, New York 10112
Telephone:
(212) 278-0509
Facsimile:
(212) 391-0525
Email:
Rmaldonado@cooperdunham.com
10
11
Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaim-Plaintiff
TELEBRANDS CORP., a New Jersey Corporation
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
MEYER MANUFACTURING COMPANY
LIMITED, a Hongkong Corporation,
Plaintiff,
16
17
v.
18
TELEBRANDS CORP., a New Jersey
Corporation,
19
20
21
CASE NO. 2:11-cv-03153 LKK-DAD
JOINT STIPULATION AND
ORDER TO ADJOURN THE
HEARING DATE FOR ALL
PENDING MOTIONS
Defendant,
____________________________________
TELEBRANDS CORP., a New Jersey
Corporation,
22
Counter-Plaintiff,
23
v.
24
25
26
MEYER MANUFACTURING COMPANY
LIMITED, a Hongkong Corporation, and
MEYER CORPORATION, U.S.,
Counter-Defendants.
27
28
Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order to adjourn the
hearing date for all pending motions
-1-
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-03153 LKK-DAD
1
Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Telebrands Corp. (“Telebrands”), and Plaintiff/Counter-
2
Defendant Meyer Manufacturing Company Limited and Counter-Defendant Meyer Corporation,
3
U.S. (collectively, “Meyer”), hereby stipulate and request that the Court modify its Scheduling
4
Order which states that all law and motion must be heard by March 29, 2013, so that all pending
5
motions may be heard together on April 8, 2013.
6
Presently, there are four pending motions before the Court:
7
1) On January 22, 2013, Telebrands filed a motion to amend its Counterclaims (D.I.1 65),
8
and noticed that motion to be heard on March 11, 2013;
9
2) On February 11, 2013, Telebrands filed a motion to amend the scheduling order to
10
permit it to file a motion to compel discovery (D.I. 67), and noticed that motion to be
11
heard on March 11, 2013;
12
3) On February 24, 2013, Meyer filed a motion to strike the expert rebuttal report of
13
Stephen M. Nowlis, Ph.D. (D.I. 68), and noticed that motion to be heard on March 25,
14
2013; and
15
4) On February 25, 2013, Meyer filed a motion for summary judgment (D.I. 71), and
16
noticed that motion to be heard on March 25, 2013.
17
Accordingly, the two motions filed by Telebrands are scheduled to be heard on March 11, 2013,
18
and the two motions filed by Meyer are scheduled to be heard on March 25, 2013.
19
The Court issued its Scheduling Order (D.I. 39) on May 31, 2012, and ordered that all law
20
and order motions must be heard by March 31, 2013. All motions filed by the parties were
21
noticed to be heard by March 31, 2013. However, Telebrands’ principal counsel is unavailable
22
on March 25, 2013, due to a previous commitment to be outside of the continental United States
23
at that time. Accordingly, Telebrands sought consent from Meyer to adjourn the hearing date for
24
the motions filed by Meyer to the next available hearing date, which is April 8, 2013.
25
26
In addition, in this action, the principal counsel for Meyer is located in Chicago, and the
principal counsel for Telebrands is located in New York. To save the parties the time and
27
1
28
“D.I.” refers to the ECF Docket Index for this action.
Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order to adjourn the
hearing date for all pending motions
-2-
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-03153 LKK-DAD
1
expense of having counsel travel to the Court for hearings on two dates, Meyer sought consent
2
from Telebrands to adjourn the hearing date for the motions filed by Telebrands to April 8, 2013,
3
so that all motions may be heard on the same date.
4
5
The parties have conferred and agreed to request that the Scheduling Order be amended
such that the four pending motions recited above will be heard on April 8, 2013.
6
This amendment will not affect any other deadlines set forth in the Scheduling Order.
7
WHEREFORE, in light of the foregoing, the parties respectfully request that the Court
8
modify the current case management schedule embodied in its May 31, 2012 Scheduling Order to
9
permit the currently pending motions (D.I. 65, 67, 68, 71) to be heard on April 8, 2013.
10
Respectfully submitted,
11
By: /s/Robert T. Maldonado
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
ROPERS, MAJESKI, KOHN & BENTLEY
Neil A. Smith, Esq. (SBN 63777)
50 West San Fernando Street, Suite 1400
San Jose, CA 95113-2429
COOPER & DUNHAM LLP
Peter D. Murray, Esq.
Robert T. Maldonado, Esq.
Hindy Dym, Esq.
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, New York 10112
Counsel for Defendant
19
20
21
By: /s/ R. David Donoghue
22
HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP
R. David Donoghue, Esq. (SBN 205730)
Michael A. Grill (Pro Hac Vice)
131 South Dearborn Street, 30th Floor
Chicago, Illinois 60603
Telephone: (312) 263-3600
Facsimile: (312) 263-6666
23
24
25
26
27
28
HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP
Matthew P. Vafidis (SBN 1003578)
50 California Street, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111
Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order to adjourn the
hearing date for all pending motions
-3-
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-03153 LKK-DAD
1
Telephone: (415) 743-6900
Facsimile: (415) 743-6910
2
Counsel for Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant
3
4
So Ordered:
5
6
Date: March 4, 2013.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order to adjourn the
hearing date for all pending motions
-4-
CASE NO. 2:11-CV-03153 LKK-DAD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?