Levi v. Cate, et al

Filing 10

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/2/2012 DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to remit the excess filing fee of $5.00 to the plaintiff; ORDERING Plaintiff to serve summons on Defendants within 60 days; DIRECTING the Clerk of Court to issue and send to the plaintiff, one summons for each defendant named in the 1 Complaint and 4 copies of the form "Consent to Proceed Before United States Magistrate Judge"; ORDERING Plaintiff to serve a copy of this Order and a copy of the consent form concurrently with service of process, and to file a certificate of such service; SETTING a Status Conference for 8/8/2012 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 26 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney, Status Reports due 14 days prior to the Status Conference. (cc. Sacramento Financial) (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRED LEVI, 11 Plaintiff, 12 vs. 13 CIV S-11-3164 MCE CKD PS M. CATE, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / Plaintiff has now paid the filing fee.1 The matter will therefore be set for status 16 17 conference. This action has been pending for over five months. It does not appear from the 18 docket that plaintiff has served defendants with summons in compliance with Federal Rule of 19 Civil Procedure 4. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m), the court may order dismissal of 20 a defendant who is not served within 120 days of the filing of the complaint. That time is now 21 passed. Plaintiff will be granted an additional sixty days to complete service of summons. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 1. The Clerk of Court is directed to remit to plaintiff the excess filing fee 24 payment of $5.00. 25 1 26 Plaintiff paid $355.00. The filing fee is only $350.00. The court will therefore order remittitur of the excess $5.00 to plaintiff. 1 1 2. Plaintiff shall serve summons on defendants in compliance with Federal Rule 2 of Civil Procedure 4 within sixty days. Failure to comply with this order may result in a 3 recommendation that the action be dismissed. 4 3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue and send plaintiff one summons for 5 each defendant named in the complaint. Plaintiff shall complete service of process on defendants 6 named in the complaint within 60 days and shall file with the court proof of service of summons. 7 Plaintiff is cautioned that this action may be dismissed if service of process is not timely 8 accomplished. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). 9 4. Plaintiff shall serve a copy of this order and a copy of the form “Consent to 10 Proceed Before United States Magistrate Judge” concurrently with service of process, and file 11 with the Clerk a certificate of such service. 12 5. Failure to comply with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure or Local Rules of 13 Practice for the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, or orders of this court, 14 may result in dismissal of this action. Even parties without counsel will be expected to comply 15 with the procedural rules. 16 6. A Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference is set for August 8, 2012 at 10:00 17 a.m. in courtroom no. 26 before the undersigned. All parties shall appear by counsel or in 18 person if acting without counsel. 19 20 7. Not later than fourteen (14) days prior to the Status Conference, the parties shall file status reports2 addressing the following matters: 21 a. Service of process; 22 b. Possible joinder of additional parties; 23 c. Any expected or desired amendment of the pleadings; 24 d. Jurisdiction and venue; 25 26 2 The parties are encouraged, when possible, to file a joint status report. 2 1 e. Anticipated motions and their scheduling; 2 f. The report required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 3 outlining the proposed discovery plan and its scheduling, including disclosure of expert 4 witnesses; 5 6 g. Future proceedings, including setting appropriate cut-off dates fordiscovery and law and motion, and the scheduling of a pretrial conference and trial; 7 h. Special procedures, if any; 8 i. Estimated trial time; 9 j. Modification of standard pretrial procedures specified by the rules due 10 to the simplicity or complexity of the proceedings; 11 12 k. Whether the case is related to any other cases, including bankruptcy; 13 l. Whether a settlement conference should be scheduled; 14 m. Whether counsel will stipulate to the magistrate judge assigned to this 15 matter acting as settlement judge and waiving disqualification by virtue of her so acting, or 16 whether they prefer to have a settlement conference before another judge; 17 18 n. Any other matters that may add to the just and expeditious disposition of this matter. 19 8. Plaintiff and counsel are reminded of their continuing duty to notify chambers 20 immediately of any settlement or other disposition (see Local Rule 160). In addition, the parties 21 are cautioned that pursuant to Local Rule 230(c), opposition to the granting of a motion must be 22 filed fourteen days preceding the noticed hearing date. The Rule further provides that “[n]o party 23 will be entitled to be heard in opposition to a motion at oral arguments if written opposition to 24 the motion has not been timely filed by that party.” Moreover, Local Rule 230(i) provides that 25 failure to appear may be deemed withdrawal of opposition to the motion or may result in 26 sanctions. Finally, Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules “may be 3 1 grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the 2 inherent power of the Court.” 3 9. The parties are informed that they may, if all consent, have this case tried by a 4 United States Magistrate Judge while preserving their right to appeal to the Ninth Circuit Court 5 of Appeals. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). The form for consent to trial by a magistrate judge is 6 attached. Any party choosing to consent may complete the form and return it to the Clerk of the 7 Court. 8 10. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send plaintiff copies (one for each 9 defendant plus one for the plaintiff) of the form, “Consent to Proceed Before United States 10 Magistrate Judge,” with this order. 11 Dated: May 2, 2012 12 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 14 15 4 levi.statset 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?