Levi v. Cate, et al

Filing 19

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/12/2012 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Morrison C. England, Jr.. Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FRED LEVI, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 No. 2: 11-cv-3164 MCE CKD PS M. CATE, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS / 16 This action was referred to the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). 17 This action was filed November 30, 2011. Plaintiff was granted numerous extensions to pay the 18 filing fee and finally, on April 30, 2012, the filing fee was paid. In an order filed May 2, 2012, 19 the court noted that service of summons had not been timely made in compliance with Federal 20 Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) and directed plaintiff to complete service of summons within sixty 21 days. Plaintiff thereafter requested an extension of time to complete service of summons and by 22 order filed June 27, 2012, plaintiff was directed to serve summons no later than August 28, 2012 23 and to file a proof of service of said summons. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to comply 24 with the order might result in a recommendation of dismissal. Plaintiff has not complied with the 25 order. This case has now been pending for over nine months and there is no evidence that 26 ///// 1 1 plaintiff has taken appropriate steps to prosecute the action or to timely serve defendants with 2 summons. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. 4 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District 5 Judge assigned to the case pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen 6 days after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written 7 objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned 8 “Objections to Findings and Recommendations.” Any reply to the objections shall be served and 9 filed within ten days after service of the objections. The parties are advised that failure to file 10 objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. 11 Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 12 Dated: September 12, 2012 13 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 14 15 16 17 4 levi3164.4m.57 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?