Jackson v. Walker et al

Filing 33

ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/27/13 ORDERING that the findings and recommendations filed 2/5/13, are adopted in full; Plaintiff's motions for injunctive relief 13 19 and 21 are denied; and Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration 31 of the court's 2/5/13, order is denied. (Becknal, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CHRISTOPHER JACKSON,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:11-CV-3167-GEB-CMK-P

vs.

ORDER

J. WALKER, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

/

17

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to

18

42 U.S.C. § 1983.The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

Eastern District of California local rules.

20

On February 5, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations

21

herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file

22

objections within a specified time. Timely objections to the findings and recommendations have

23

been filed.

24

///

25

///

26

///
1

1

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule

2

304(f), this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the

3

entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by

4

proper analysis.

5

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

6

1.

The findings and recommendations filed February 5, 2013, are adopted in

2.

Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief (Docs. 13, 19, and 21) are denied;

3.

Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (Doc. 31) of the court’s February 5,

7

full;

8
9
10

and

11

2013, order is denied.

12

Dated: March 27, 2013

13
14
15

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.
Senior United States District Judge

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2