Rocky D Froemel v. Matthew Cate et al

Filing 17

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 07/20/12 DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Plummer, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

ROCKY D. FROEMEL,

11

Plaintiff,

12

No. 2:11-cv-03207-DAD P

vs.

13

MATTHEW CATE, et al.,

14

Defendants.

15

ORDER
/

16

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

17

42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction in this action

18

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). See Doc. No. 5. By order filed June 6, 2012, plaintiff’s

19

complaint was dismissed and twenty-eight days leave to file an amended complaint was granted.

20

The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint

21

or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this

22

action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

23

DATED: July 20, 2012.

24
25
26

DAD:4
froe3207.fta

1