Tavake v. Allied Insurance Company
Filing
85
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 11/6/15: Plaintiffs shall show cause in writing within fourteen days of the date of this order as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SAM TAVAKE and TAMI TAVAKE,
12
Plaintiffs,
13
14
No. 2:11-cv-3259 KJM CKD PS (TEMP)
v.
ORDER
ALLIED INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiffs are proceeding pro se in the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a
17
18
United States Magistrate Judge under Local Rule 302(c)(21.)
On September 24, 2015, the court issued an order setting this matter for a status
19
20
conference on November 6, 2015. (Dkt. No. 76.) That order also required plaintiffs to file status
21
reports on or before October 23, 2015. Neither plaintiff, however, filed a status report or
22
appeared at the November 6, 2015 status conference, nor did anyone appear on behalf of either
23
plaintiff. In light of plaintiffs’ pro se status, and in the interests of justice, the court will provide
24
plaintiffs with an opportunity to show good cause for their conduct.
25
/////
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, the court HEREBY ORDERS that plaintiffs show cause in writing within
2
fourteen days of the date of this order as to why this case should not be dismissed for lack of
3
prosecution.1 Failure to timely file the required writing will result in a recommendation that this
4
case be dismissed.
5
Dated: November 6, 2015
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
BVD/tavake3259.osc.docx
1
Alternatively, if plaintiffs no longer wish to pursue this civil action they may comply with this
order by filing a notice of voluntary dismissal pursuant to Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?