Stanley et al v. Iron Mountain, Inc. et al

Filing 67

ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to FRCP 41(a) signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 5/12/15. CASE CLOSED. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES ex rel. BRENT STANLEY and PATRICK McKILLOP, and STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al., ex rel. BRENT STANLEY and PATRICK McKILLOP, 10 11 12 13 14 No. 2:11-cv-03260-GEB-DAD ORDER CLOSING CASE Plaintiffs, v. IRON MOUNTAIN, INC., and IRON MOUNTAIN INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, INC., Defendants. 15 16 On May 2, 2015, the State of California and Relators 17 Patrick McKillop and Brent Stanley (“Realtors”) filed a Joint 18 Status Report (“JSR”) in which they state: 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) and California Government Code § 12652(c)(1), the Relators, the United States, the State of California, Santa Clara County, and San Bernardino County, and Defendants Iron Mountain Incorporated and Iron Mountain Information Management, LLC have all previously filed Joint Stipulations of Dismissal in accordance with the terms of different settlement agreements entered into among the Parties, see ECF Nos. 54, 55, 56 & 60, and the Court has entered orders of dismissal as to each, see ECF Nos. 57, 58, 59, & 61. As noted in the status report filed the State of California and Relator[s] March 19, 2015 (ECF No. 64), the State California and Relators were finalizing 1 by on of an 1 agreement in principle at the time regarding Relators’ share of the proceeds of the settlement with the State of California, but they had not yet finalized that agreement at the time the status report was filed. The State of California and the Relators have now finalized that agreement. Relators had previously finalized agreements concerning relators’ share with the United States, Santa Clara County, and San Bernardino County. 2 3 4 5 6 Based on the foregoing, the Relators and the State of California both agree to the case being closed. 7 8 9 (JSR, ECF No. 66.) Accordingly, this case shall be closed. 10 11 Dated: May 12, 2015 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?