Foy v. Vallejo Police Department

Filing 133

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 4/20/2017 DENYING plaintiff's 132 motion to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff is advised that any additional documents filed in this case will be disregarded and no order will issue in response to future filings. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ALFRED JAMES FOY,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:11-cv-3262-MCE-CMK-P

vs.

ORDER

VALLEJO POLICE DEPARTMENT,

15

Defendant.

16

/

17

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42

18

U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to file an amended complaint (Doc.

19

132).

20

Plaintiff is informed that this case is closed. This case was set for jury trial on

21

January 23, 2017. On day one of those proceedings, plaintiff moved to continue the trial, which

22

was denied. Plaintiff then moved to dismiss his case, which was granted by the court with no

23

objection from the defense. Judgment was entered on February 22, 2017. Plaintiff is now

24

attempting to reopen this closed case by way of amending his complaint. Such proceedings are

25

not authorized. As such, his motion to file an amended complaint will be denied. Plaintiff is

26

advised that any additional documents filed in this case will be disregarded and no order will
1

1
2
3

issue in response to future filings.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to file an
amended complaint (Doc. 132) is denied.

4
5
6
7

DATED: April 20, 2017
______________________________________
CRAIG M. KELLISON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2