Foy v. Vallejo Police Department

Filing 81

ORDER ADOPTING 79 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/24/15. Defendant Williams' 72 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED and Defendant City of Vallejo's 73 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. This action shall continue as to Defendants Williams, Bauer, Huff, Whitney and Yates. (Manzer, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

ALFRED JAMES FOY,

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

No. 2:11-cv-3262-MCE-CMK-P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

VALLEJO POLICE DEPARTMENT, et
al.,
Defendants.

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
§ 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District
of California local rules.
On March 3, 2015, 2014, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein
which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections
within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed March 3, 2015, are ADOPTED IN
FULL;
1

1
2

2. Defendant City of Vallejo’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 73) is
GRANTED;

3

3. Defendant Williams’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 72) is DENIED;

4

4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant City

5
6

of Vallejo only; and
5. This action shall continue as to Defendants Williams, Bauer, Huff, Whitney,

7

and Yates.

8

IT IS SO ORDERED.

9

Dated: March 24, 2015

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2