Moore v. Gonzalez et al

Filing 102

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/4/2014 ORDERING plaintiff's attorney's request for authority to incur costs by appointed pro bono counsel James V. Weixel is GRANTED. (Crouch, J)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IMERRICKJOSE MOORE, Plaintiff(s) No. E:ll-CV-3273 ACP vs. u IL. GONZALES, etal., Defendants. REQUEST FOR AUTHORITY TO INCUR COSTS (APPOINTED COUNSEL) AND REQUEST FOR PAYMENT REQUEST OF PRO BONO FOR PRE-APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES Complete this form and return it to the court (with two copies) for approval prior to incurring the cost for which reimbursement is requested. I, ~ames V. Weixel r_~ "~~_~~~~~~"~ ~_ , attorney for plaintiff(s), declare as follows: ~;::':='~.:..:.I~=;:;:;...,&=~~lII,.I....;i"",nl...this action on ~ovember 25, 2~1~.. __ , by the Honorable llison Claire , United States District Judge/Magistrate Judge. I believe that thef()llowing course oraction is reasonably necessary to the prosecution of this action: Initial visit with inmate client to discuss case and obtain case materials (inmate previously litigated action in pro per) - involves travel from counsel's office in San Francisco to High Desert State Prison in Susanville, and vernight stay for morning meeting on 12/11/2014 (already arranged with HDSP litigation coordinator). Estimated one-night hotel expenses and per diem meals not exceeding GSA allowance, and approximately 00 miles round-trip by car at GSA rate of $0.56/mile. Counsel seeking reimbursement must support all claimed expenses by submitting invoices, receipts or similar documentation. Without such documentation, counsel will not be reimbursed. I have made reasonable inquiry and believe that the cost of this course of action will not exceed the amount of $ F75.00 I therefore request that this court authorize the expenditure in an amount not to exceed that stated above for the completion of this contemplated course of action. REQUEST OF PRO BONO FOR PRE-APPROVAL OF EXPENDITURES - PAGE 2 Case Number: ~:~~:<,,-~32~3 ~~~. The following payments of costs have been heretofore approved in this matter: Amount Approved ~/A I ~ Amount Paid Purpose n~. ~/A ~one to date . . 'It L I lit I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Signed this r~h day of IDe~cemberu ~ . ' 20 F" ' at ~an Francisco I ' California. r~ JamesV Weixel Attorney for Plaintiff(s) The above expenditure is / Approved - - - ­Denied Or, - - - -Good cause appearing therefore, this matter is set for discovery conference, pursuant to rule _ _-" on _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _, at _ _ _ _-' Number .M. in Courtroom --- Dated: J:>,'I! C e """",b t (' ~ I l 0 \1 United States District Judge/Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?