Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Griffith et al
Filing
4
ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 2/17/2012 ADOPTING 3 Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING Defendant Stacey Griffith's 2 Motion to Proceed IFP; REMANDING this action to the Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin. DIRECTING the Clerk to close this case. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Michel, G)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
DEUTSCHE BANK,
NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY
11
Plaintiff,
12
vs.
13
14
STACEY J GRIFFITH, et al.,
ORDER
Defendant.
15
/
16
17
18
No. CIV S-11-3280 LKK DAD PS
Defendants are proceeding pro se in the above-entitled action. The matter was
referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On December 27, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
19
20
herein which were served on defendants and which contained notice that any objections to the
21
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days after service of the findings
22
and recommendations. The fourteen-day period has expired, and defendants have not filed
23
objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
24
25
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis.
26
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed December 27, 2011 (Doc. No. 3) are
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
adopted in full;
2. Defendant Stacey Griffith’s December 12, 2011 application to proceed in
forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2) is denied;
3. This action is summarily remanded to the Superior Court of California, County
of San Joaquin; and
4. The Clerk is directed to close this case.
DATED: February 17, 2012.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?