Montgomery v. Brooks et al

Filing 40

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 11/28/2012 GRANTING the 39 stipulation and proposed order; Discovery is continued to 2/26/2013; Pretrial Motions shall be filed by 5/9/2013; the remainder of the 8/22/12 scheduling order remains in effect. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KENNETH GENE MONTGOMERY, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 No. CIV S-11-3304 GGH P vs. SGT. BROOKS, et al. 14 Defendants. 15 ORDER / 16 Plaintiff proceeds in this action with counsel pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The 17 parties have filed a stipulation and proposed order extending time to conduct discovery. They 18 seek to extend the discovery cutoff from November 26, 2012 to February 26, 2013. This 19 proposal interferes with the current deadline for pretrial motions, however, which is February 14, 20 2013. See Dkt. no. 38. Therefore, the parties’ request will be granted, and the pretrial motion 21 deadline will also be extended. 22 In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 1. The stipulation and proposed order, filed November 19, 2012 (dkt. no. 39), is 24 granted; 25 26 2. The discovery deadline is continued to February 26, 2013; \\\\\ 1 1 3. Pretrial motions shall be filed by May 9, 2013. The remainder of the August 2 22, 2012 scheduling order remains in effect. 3 DATED: November 28, 2012 4 /s/ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 GGH/076 mont3304.stip 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?