Montgomery v. Brooks et al
Filing
50
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/24/13 ORDERING that by and between Plaintiff Ken Montgomery and Respondent Sgt. Brooks that the plaintiff voluntarily dismisses this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Catherine Sempepos, SBN: 216901
Law Offices of Catherine Sempepos
1804 Garnet Avenue, suite 393
San Diego, CA 92109
Phone: (619) 320-5090; FAX: (888) 794-5904
attorneynorcal@gmail.com
Attorney for Plaintiff
KENNETH MONTGOMERY
7
8
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
)
)
Kenneth Gene Montgomery,
)
)
Plaintiff
) Case No.: 2:11-CV-03304-GGH P
)
v.
) STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL
)
Sergeant Brooks, Correctional Officer
Parker, sued in their individual capacities, )
)
and Does 5 – 100, inclusive,
)
Defendants
)
TO: ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.41(a)(1), plaintiff voluntarily
24
25
Dismisses the above-captioned action against defendants Sergeant Brooks, Correctional Officer
26
Parker, sued in their individual capacities, and Does 5 – 100, inclusive, without prejudice.
27
28
Plaintiff represents that he has not and will not receive any payment, direct or indirect, in
STIPULATION - 1
1
connection with the dismissal of the action.
2
3
4
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ken Montgomery and
Respondent Sgt. Brooks that the plaintiff voluntarily dismisses this action without prejudice.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Dated: 1-15-13
By:
/s/ Catherine Sempepos
Catherine Sempepos,
Attorney for Plaintiff,
KENNETH GENE MONTGOMERY
Dated 1-17-13
By:
/s/Michael G. Lee,
Michael G. Lee,
Attorney for Defendants,
SERGEANT BROOKS, et al.
16
17
18
19
20
IT IS SO ORDERED
/s/ Gregory G. Hollows
_______________________________________
Gregory G. Hollows
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
23
January 24, 2013
________________________
DATE
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?