Montgomery v. Brooks et al

Filing 50

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gregory G. Hollows on 1/24/13 ORDERING that by and between Plaintiff Ken Montgomery and Respondent Sgt. Brooks that the plaintiff voluntarily dismisses this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Catherine Sempepos, SBN: 216901 Law Offices of Catherine Sempepos 1804 Garnet Avenue, suite 393 San Diego, CA 92109 Phone: (619) 320-5090; FAX: (888) 794-5904 attorneynorcal@gmail.com Attorney for Plaintiff KENNETH MONTGOMERY 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 ) ) Kenneth Gene Montgomery, ) ) Plaintiff ) Case No.: 2:11-CV-03304-GGH P ) v. ) STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL ) Sergeant Brooks, Correctional Officer Parker, sued in their individual capacities, ) ) and Does 5 – 100, inclusive, ) Defendants ) TO: ALL PARTIES AND THEIR COUNSEL OF RECORD PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.41(a)(1), plaintiff voluntarily 24 25 Dismisses the above-captioned action against defendants Sergeant Brooks, Correctional Officer 26 Parker, sued in their individual capacities, and Does 5 – 100, inclusive, without prejudice. 27 28 Plaintiff represents that he has not and will not receive any payment, direct or indirect, in STIPULATION - 1 1 connection with the dismissal of the action. 2 3 4 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ken Montgomery and Respondent Sgt. Brooks that the plaintiff voluntarily dismisses this action without prejudice. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Dated: 1-15-13 By: /s/ Catherine Sempepos Catherine Sempepos, Attorney for Plaintiff, KENNETH GENE MONTGOMERY Dated 1-17-13 By: /s/Michael G. Lee, Michael G. Lee, Attorney for Defendants, SERGEANT BROOKS, et al. 16 17 18 19 20 IT IS SO ORDERED /s/ Gregory G. Hollows _______________________________________ Gregory G. Hollows UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 22 23 January 24, 2013 ________________________ DATE 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?