Garcia et al v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 27

STIPULATION and ORDER 26 signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/27/13 ORDERING that the deadline for hearing Defendants' motion for summary judgment is extended from February 11, 2014 to March 13, 2014. (Kastilahn, A)

1

5

RANDOLPH CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP
ROBERT L. CHALFANT, SBN 203051
WENDY MOTOOKA, SBN 233589
1030 G Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Defendants

7

STEWART KATZ, SBN 127425
LAW OFFICES OF STEWART KATZ
555 University Ave., Suite 270
Sacramento, CA 95825
Telephone: [phone]

2
3
4

8
9
10
11
12
13

LUIS A. CESPEDES, SBN 97264
LAW OFFICES OF LUIS A. CESPEDES
719 11th Street,
Sacramento, California 95814
Telephone: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

14
15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

16

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17
18
19
20
21

JUAN RAFAEL GARCIA; MARIA
GARCIA; NATALY GARCIA,
YAMILET GARCIA and OSWALDO
GARCIA (minors through their grandfather
and guardian ad litem, Francisco Garcia);
NATALY GARCIA, Individually;
YAMILET GARCIA, Individually; and
OSWALDO GARCIA, Individually,

24
25
26
27

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE
TO HEAR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER
THEREON

Plaintiffs,

22
23

No.: 2:11-cv-03317 TLN CKD

vs.
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO;
SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT DEPUTY JEFFREY
MORACE (BADGE #70), and DOES 1
through 25,
Defendants.

28
RANDOLPH, CREGGER &
CHALFANT, LLP.
1030 G St.
Sacramento, CA 95814
[phone]

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO HEAR
MSJ; ORDER THEREON
Case No. 2:11-cv-03317 TLN CKD

1

1

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties through their counsel of record that the

2

deadline to hear Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, as set by the Court in its Status

3

(Pretrial Scheduling) Order of 10/11/12 (Dkt #21), be extended by 30 days from February 11,

4
2014 to March 13, 2014.
5
Good cause exists for this extension because the parties are currently engaged in

6
7

settlement negotiations, are close to resolving the matter, and need the additional time to finalize

8

a settlement. In the event the case does not settle, the issues to be entertained in a summary

9

judgment motion will be pared down from those to be considered if the motion were filed at the

10

present time.

11
12
13

DATE: December 23, 2013

LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ

14
/s/ Stewart Katz
STEWART KATZ, SBN 127425
Attorneys for Plaintiffs JUAN RAFAEL GARCIA; MARIA
GARCIA; NATALY GARCIA, YAMILET GARCIA and
OSWALDO GARCIA (minors through their grandfather
and guardian ad litem, Francisco Garcia); NATALY
GARCIA, Individually; YAMILET GARCIA, Individually;
and OSWALDO GARCIA, Individually

15
16
17
18
19
20

DATE: December 23, 2013

RANDOLPH CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP

21
/s/ Robert L. Chalfant
ROBERT L. CHALFANT
Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
and SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT DEPUTY JEFFREY MORACE (BADGE
#70)

22
23
24
25
26

///

27

///

28
RANDOLPH, CREGGER &
CHALFANT, LLP.
1030 G St.
Sacramento, CA 95814
[phone]

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO HEAR
MSJ; ORDER THEREON
Case No. 2:11-cv-03317 TLN CKD

2

1
ORDER

2
3
4

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The deadline for hearing Defendants’ motion for summary

judgment is extended from February 11, 2014 to March 13, 2014.

5
6
7

Dated: December 27, 2013

8
9
10
11

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
RANDOLPH, CREGGER &
CHALFANT, LLP.
1030 G St.
Sacramento, CA 95814
[phone]

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO HEAR
MSJ; ORDER THEREON
Case No. 2:11-cv-03317 TLN CKD

3