Garcia et al v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 29

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/3/14. Plaintiffs MARIA GARCIA; NATALY GARCIA, YAMILET GARCIA and OSWALDO GARCIA (minors through their grandfather and guardian ad litem, Francisco Garcia); NATALY GARCIA, Individua lly; YAMILET GARCIA, Individually; and OSWALDO GARCIA, Individually, dismiss with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1) their claims against Defendants in this action. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. The claims of Plaintiff JUAN RAFAEL GARCIA against Defendants remain. (Mena-Sanchez, L) Modified on 1/7/2014 (Mena-Sanchez, L).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

RANDOLPH CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP
ROBERT L. CHALFANT, SBN 203051
WENDY MOTOOKA, SBN 233589
1030 G Street
Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF
SACRAMENTO and SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT DEPUTY JEFFREY
MORACE (BADGE #70)

8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14

JUAN RAFAEL GARCIA; MARIA
GARCIA; NATALY GARCIA,
YAMILET GARCIA and OSWALDO
GARCIA (minors through their grandfather
and guardian ad litem, Francisco Garcia);
NATALY GARCIA, Individually;
YAMILET GARCIA, Individually; and
OSWALDO GARCIA, Individually,

No.: 2:11-cv-03317 TLN CKD
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER
THEREON

15
Plaintiffs,
16
vs.
17
18
19

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO;
SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT DEPUTY JEFFREY
MORACE (BADGE #70), and DOES 1
through 25,

20
Defendants.
21
22
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their
23
attorneys of record that Plaintiffs MARIA GARCIA; NATALY GARCIA, YAMILET GARCIA
24
and OSWALDO GARCIA (minors through their grandfather and guardian ad litem, Francisco
25
Garcia); NATALY GARCIA, Individually; YAMILET GARCIA, Individually; and OSWALDO
26
GARCIA, Individually, dismiss with prejudice pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1) their claims against
27

Defendants in the above-captioned action. Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

28
RANDOLPH, CREGGER &
CHALFANT, LLP.
1030 G St.
Sacramento, CA 95814
[phone]

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER THEREON
Case No. 2:11-cv-03317 TLN CKD

1

1

The claims of Plaintiff JUAN RAFAEL GARCIA against Defendants remain.

2
3

DATE: December 30, 2013

LAW OFFICE OF STEWART KATZ

4
/s/ Stewart Katz
STEWART KATZ, SBN 127425
Attorneys for Plaintiffs JUAN RAFAEL GARCIA; MARIA
GARCIA; NATALY GARCIA, YAMILET GARCIA and
OSWALDO GARCIA (minors through their grandfather
and guardian ad litem, Francisco Garcia); NATALY
GARCIA, Individually; YAMILET GARCIA, Individually;
and OSWALDO GARCIA, Individually

5
6
7
8
9
10

LAW OFFICES OF LUIS A. CESPEDES

11

/s/ Luis A. Cespedes
LUIS A. CESPEDES, SBN 97264
Attorneys for Plaintiffs JUAN RAFAEL GARCIA; MARIA
GARCIA; NATALY GARCIA, YAMILET GARCIA and
OSWALDO GARCIA (minors through their grandfather
and guardian ad litem, Francisco Garcia); NATALY
GARCIA, Individually; YAMILET GARCIA, Individually;
and OSWALDO GARCIA, Individually

12
13
14
15
16

DATE: December 30, 2013

RANDOLPH CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP

17
18

/s/ Robert L. Chalfant
ROBERT L. CHALFANT
Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
and SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT DEPUTY JEFFREY MORACE (BADGE
#70)

19
20
21
22
23

ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25

DATED: January 3, 2014

26
27

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

28
RANDOLPH, CREGGER &
CHALFANT, LLP.
1030 G St.
Sacramento, CA 95814
[phone]

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER THEREON
Case No. 2:11-cv-03317 TLN CKD

2