Federal National Mortgage Association v. Christian
Filing
4
ORDER adopting 3 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and REMANDING CASE to Placer County Superior Court signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/23/12: The Clerk serve a certified copy of this order to the Clerk of the Superior Court for the County of Placer. CASE CLOSED.(Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION,
11
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
DAVID CHRISTIAN,
15
16
CIV S-11-3326 JAM GGH PS
Defendant.
ORDER
__________________________________/
17
On January 13, 2012, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations
18
herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the
19
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed.
20
Accordingly, the court presumes any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v.
21
United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are
22
reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir.
23
1983).
24
The court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing,
25
concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the Findings and Recommendations in full.
26
\\\\\
1
1
2
3
4
5
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Findings and Recommendations filed
January 13, 2012, are ADOPTED and
1. The state action is summarily remanded to the Superior Court, County of
Placer, Placer Auburn/Dewitt Courthouse;
2. The Clerk serve a certified copy of this order to the Clerk of the Superior Court
6
for the County of Placer, Placer Auburn/Dewitt Courthouse, and reference the state case number
7
(MCV0051554) in the proof of service; and
8
9
3. The Clerk is directed to close this case.
DATED: February 23, 2012
10
11
/s/ John A. Mendez
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?