Hann v. Sacramento County Sheriff Department

Filing 25

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 5/23/2013 DISMISSING this action without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

EVAN E. HANN,

11

Plaintiff,

12

No. 2:11-cv-3368 JFM P

vs.

13
14

SACRAMENTO COUNTY
SHERIFF DEPARTMENT,

15

Defendant.

16

ORDER
/

17

Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to

18

42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff, the only party to appear in this action, has consented to proceed

19

before a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). See Consent filed

20

January 3, 2012 (ECF No. 6). By order filed April 12, 2013, plaintiff was ordered to show in

21

writing, within thirty days, why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice due to the

22

failure to name any individual defendant against whom a cognizable claim might be stated. The

23

thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to

24

the court’s order.

25

/////

26

/////

1
2
3

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without
prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
Dated: May 23, 2013

4

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

5
6
7
8

12
hann3368.fsc

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2