Stevens v. Barns
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/25/13 ORDERING that both of petitioners January 28, 2013 motions for record materials (Dkt. Nos. 27 , 28 ) are denied. (Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
JAMEL R. STEVENS,
11
Petitioner,
12
13
No. 2:11-cv-3390 MCE CKD P
vs.
RON BARNS,
14
ORDER
Respondent.
15
/
16
On January 28, 2013, petitioner filed two motions for record materials pursuant to
17
the California Rules of Court. (Dkt. Nos. 27, 28.) These state court rules do not apply in this
18
federal action. Moreover, in its order dated December 28, 2011, the court stated that an answer
19
filed in this action “shall be accompanied by all transcripts and other documents relevant to the
20
issues presented in the petition.” (Dkt. No. 3, citing Rule 5, Fed. R. Governing § 2254 Cases.)
21
Accordingly, shortly after respondent filed an answer (Dkt. No. 15), he lodged numerous
22
documents with the court concerning the underlying conviction in this action. (Dkt. No. 17.) At
23
this time, the court has no reason to believe that respondent’s lodged documents do not include
24
all relevant materials.
25
////
26
////
1
1
2
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT both of petitioner’s January 28,
2013 motions for record materials (Dkt. Nos. 27, 28) are denied.
Dated: February 25, 2013
4
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
6
7
8
2
stev3390.ord
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?