Ortega v. Aramark et al

Filing 9

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/22/2012 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

RUDOLFO ORTEGA, JR.,

11

Plaintiff,

No. 2:11-cv-3391 KJN P

vs.
12
ARAMARK, et al.,
13
Defendants.

ORDER

14
/
15
16

Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28

17

U.S.C. § 636(c). By order filed March 30, 2012, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty

18

days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. The thirty day period has now expired, and

19

plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

20

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without

21

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

22

DATED: May 22, 2012

23
_____________________________________
KENDALL J. NEWMAN
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

24
25

orte3391.fta

26
1