Brown v. Hume et al

Filing 23

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/3/2012, DENYING plaintiff's 22 request for appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

DEXTER BROWN,
Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15
16

No. 2:11-cv-3441 EFB P

Defendants.

11

ORDER

vs.
HUME, et al.,

/
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42

17

U.S.C. § 1983. He requests that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to

18

require counsel to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States

19

Dist. Court, 490 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request an

20

attorney to voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1); Terrell v.

21

Brewer, 935 F.2d 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36

22

(9th Cir. 1990). When determining whether “exceptional circumstances” exist, the court must

23

consider the likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the plaintiff to articulate

24

his claims pro se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Palmer v. Valdez, 560

25

F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009). Having considered those factors, the court finds there are no

26

exceptional circumstances in this case.
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s request for appointment of

2

counsel, Dckt. No. 22, is denied.

3

DATED: August 3, 2012.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
2