United States of America v. 34,196 Rentable Square Feet, More or Less, at 3870 Rosin Court, Sacramento, California et al

Filing 116

ORDER signed by Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 11/26/2013 ORDERING that the Court CONTINUES the current Trial date to 6/9/2014 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. The Court sets a Final Pretrial Conference on 5/1/2014 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Hearing on the 86 Motion to Exclude is set for 5/9/2014 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. A Settlement Conference is set for 1/21/2014 at 09:00 AM in C ourtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. The parties are directed to submit their confidential settlement conference statements to the Court using the following email address: [e-mail]. Statements are due at least 7 days prior to the Settlement Conference. (Zignago, K.)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15
16

No. 2:11-cv-03467-KJM-AC

v.

ORDER

34,196 RENTABLE SQUARE FEET,
MORE OR LESS, AT 3870 ROSIN
COURT; SACRAMENTO,
CALIFORNIA, et al.,
Defendants.

17

This matter is before the court on the motion of defendants Clinton Reilly,

18
19

individually, and in his capacity as trustee under that Certain Clinton Reilly Family Trust Dated

20

June 8, 2001 (“defendants”) to continue the trial date based on the unavailability of counsel.

21

(ECF 102.) Plaintiff United States of America opposes the motion. (ECF 111.) The court held a

22

hearing on the matter on November 14, 2013, at which Lynn Ernce and Victoria Boesch appeared

23

for plaintiff and Robert Moore for defendants. As explained below, the court continues the trial

24

date to June 9, 2014.

25

I.

STANDARD

26

Motions for a continuance of the trial are addressed to the sound discretion of the

27

district court, as district courts have “considerable latitude in granting or denying continuances.”

28
1

1

United States v. Pope, 841 F.2d 954, 956 (9th Cir. 1988). “In assessing the need for a

2

continuance, four factors should be considered: 1) the requesting party’s diligence in preparing

3

his case for trial; 2) the need for the continuance; 3) whether granting the continuance will

4

inconvenience the court and the opposing party, including its witnesses; and 4) the extent to

5

which the party requesting the continuance will suffer harm as a result of the district court’s

6

denial.” Bailey v. AT&T Wireless Servs. Div., 2:99-CV-2522-MCE-EFB, 2007 WL 185496, at *1

7

(E.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2007) (citing United States v. 2.61 Acres of Land, More or Less, Situated in

8

Mariposa Cnty., State of Cal., 791 F.2d 666, 671 (9th Cir. 1985)). “No one of these factors is

9

dispositive; absent a showing of prejudice to the requesting party, a district court's refusal to grant

10

a continuance will not be disturbed on appeal.” Id.

11

Here, according to a court order issued on January 2, 2013, a bench trial is set for

12

January 27, 2014. (ECF 66.) On November 8, 2013, defendants filed the instant motion to

13

continue the trial date currently set for January 27, 2014, to a date in late March or early April of

14

2014. (ECF 102 at 2.) Defendants seek a trial continuance because defendants’ counsel will be

15

unavailable on the currently scheduled trial date due to a confirmed trial set in state court. (ECF

16

103 at 1.) Plaintiff opposes the motion, but concedes the defense has a confirmed conflict.

17

(ECFs 111, 112.)

18

After considering the parties’ contentions and the court’s own availability for trial,

19

the court continues the current trial date to June 9, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. The court sets a final

20

pretrial conference on May 1, 2014 at 2:30 p.m.

21
22
23

The court sets the hearing on the motion to exclude (ECF No. 86) for May 9, 2014
at 10:00 a.m.
Additionally, after discussion with counsel at hearing, the court refers the case to a

24

court convened settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman, who has been

25

identified by random draw, to take place on January 21, 2014 at 9:00 am in courtroom number

26

25. The parties are directed to submit their confidential settlement conference statements to the

27

Court using the following email address: [e-mail]. If a party desires to share

28

additional confidential information with the Court, they may do so pursuant to the provisions of
2

1

Local Rule 270(d) and (e). Statements are due at least 7 days prior to the Settlement Conference.

2

Each party is reminded of the requirement that it be represented in person at the settlement

3

conference by a person able to dispose of the case or fully authorized to settle the matter at the

4

settlement conference on any terms. See Local Rule 270.

5
6

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 26, 2013.

7
8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3