Morgan Hill Concerned Parents Association v. California Department of Education

Filing 137

ORDER re Federal Rules of Evidence signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 12/17/15. (Kaminski, H)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

MORGAN HILL CONCERNED
PARENTS ASSOCIATION, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

13
14
15
16

No. 2:11-cv-3471 KJM AC

ORDER
v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION, et al.,
Defendants.

17
18

On November 3, 2015, the parties were ordered to propose an order under Fed. R. Civ. P.

19

502(d) for review and approval by the undersigned. See ECF No. 127. The parties failed to

20

arrive at a joint proposed order. The undersigned having considered the parties’ separate

21

proposed orders (ECF Nos. 135, 136), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

22

(a) No Waiver by Disclosure.

23

This Order is entered pursuant to Rule 502(d) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. Subject

24

to the provisions of this Order, if a party (the “Disclosing Party”) discloses information in

25

connection with the pending litigation that the Disclosing Party thereafter claims to be protected

26

by the attorney-client privilege or work product protected material (“Protected Information”), the

27

disclosure of that Protected Information will not constitute or be deemed a waiver or forfeiture –

28

in this or any other action – of any claim of privilege or work product protection that the
1

1

Disclosing Party would otherwise be entitled to assert with respect to the Protected Information

2

and its subject matter. This Order applies to all discovery, including Electronically Stored

3

Information (“ESI”).

4

If a Disclosing Party discloses Protected Information but fails to comply with the

5

procedures set forth in this Order, it waives the privilege or protection otherwise available for that

6

information, and Fed. R. Civ. P. 502(d) will not apply to that information.

7
8
9

(b) Notification Requirements.
(1) Disclosing Party Notification. Upon discovering the disclosure of Protected
Information, the Disclosing Party must promptly notify the party receiving the Protected

10

Information (“the Receiving Party”), in writing, that it has disclosed that Protected Information

11

without intending a waiver by the disclosure. The notice shall be accompanied, or followed

12

within 10 days, by a Privilege Log of the privileged or protected materials; and the Privilege Log

13

shall comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5)(A)(ii). Upon receiving such notification, the

14

Receiving Party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the identified documents and any

15

copies it has, as provided by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(b)(5)(B), and promptly notify the Disclosing Party

16

that it has done so. The Receiving Party shall not use the documents until the status of the

17

documents has been resolved.

18

(2) Receiving Party Notification. If a Receiving Party discovers potentially

19

Protected Information that the Disclosing Party has produced, the Receiving Party must promptly

20

notify the Disclosing Party of the discovery. Such notification shall not waive the Receiving

21

Party's ability to subsequently challenge any assertion of privilege with respect to the identified

22

document. Upon receiving the notice from the Receiving Party, the Disclosing Party has ten (10)

23

business days to commence the “Disclosing Party Notification” process, above.

24

(c) Contesting Claims of Privilege or Work Product Protection.

25

If the Receiving Party contests the Disclosing Party’s claim of attorney-client privilege or

26

work product protection as to any document itemized in the Disclosing Party’s privilege log, the

27

Receiving Party shall – after having sequestered, destroyed or returned the documents as provided

28

for above – provide notice to the Disclosing Party of its challenge to the protected status of the
2

1

document within ten (10) business days of receiving the Privilege Log. The Disclosing Party

2

must, within ten (10) business days of receiving the Receiving Party’s challenge to the claim of

3

the protected status of a document contained in the Privilege Log, move the Court for a Protective

4

Order excusing it from producing the challenged document, or compelling the Receiving Party to

5

destroy or return it (“Motion for Protective Order”). Any such motion shall be made in

6

accordance with the provisions of E.D. Cal. R. 251, except as modified herein.

7

Any such motion must be filed under seal. The opposition to the Motion for Protective

8

Order may not rely on the fact or circumstance of the disclosure. Unless otherwise ordered by

9

this Court, pending resolution of such Motion, the Receiving Party must not use the challenged

10

information in any way or disclose it to any person other than those required by law to be served

11

with a copy of the sealed Motion.

12
13
14
15
16

(d) Stipulated Time Periods. The parties may stipulate to extend the time periods set forth
in paragraphs (b) and (c).
(e) Rule 502(b)(2). The provisions of Federal Rule of Evidence 502(b)(2) are inapplicable
to the production of Protected Information under this Order.
(f) Burden of Proving Privilege or Work Product Protection. The Disclosing Party retains

17

the burden upon challenge pursuant to paragraph (c) of establishing the privileged or protected

18

nature of the Protected Information.

19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20

DATED: December 17, 2015

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3