Morgan Hill Concerned Parents Association v. California Department of Education

Filing 170

ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 04/04/16 ORDERING that the Discovery Protocol remains in force, and will not be modified except by an order of court after a showing of good cause; counsel shall work toward the completion of disc overy in this case in good faith; the parties and the Special Master will continue to work toward the production of email and network files as specified in the Discovery Protocol. In all other respects, the court has determined the parties will not b enefit from further direct coordination with the Special Master. The parties are directed to restrict their communications with him to discussions about the production of email and network files. The Special Master will continue to fulfill his role, but at this point by assisting as an independent technical expert, including by assisting the assigned Magistrate Judge in any discovery matter she deems requires his assistance. Any end runs around the orderly procedure for reimbursement of the Spec ial Master shall be addressed through appropriate sanctions. To clarify the Special Master's role as a surrogate of the court, the procedure for payment of his reasonable expenses is hereby modified to provide that upon approval of his expenses by the Magistrate Judge, the party owing payment shall promptly forward the funds due to the Clerk of the Court, who is directed to establish an account for this purpose. The Clerk will then disburse the funds to the Special Master as approved by the Magistrate Judge. The court expressly reserves the right to further modify the procedure for payment of the Special Master if future circumstances call for such modification (cc: Financial). (Benson, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12
13
14

MORGAN HILL CONCERNED
PARENTS ASSOCIATION, an
unincorporated association, and
CONCERNED PARENTS
ASSOCIATION, an unincorporated
association,

17
18

ORDER

Plaintiffs,

15
16

No. 2:11-cv-03471-KJM-AC

v.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
EDUCATION and DOES 1 through 5,
Defendants.

19
20
21

The E-discovery Special Master recently has informed the court that, with the one

22

exception noted below, he has exhausted all reasonable efforts to facilitate the parties’ efforts to

23

move forward with the discovery of electronically stored information in this case. The court

24

therefore orders as follows.

25

The court previously approved as modified the Discovery Protocol proposed by

26

the Special Master. See Order Mar. 1, 2016, ECF No. 164; Order Nov. 3, 2015, ECF No. 127;

27

Discovery Protocol 8–11, ECF No. 127-1. The Discovery Protocol remains in force, and will not

28

be modified except by an order of court after a showing of good cause.
1

1

Both the parties and this court have an obligation to advance this litigation fairly

2

and efficiently. See, e.g., Fed. R. Civ. P. 1. This court has inherent power to manage its docket,

3

if necessary by imposing appropriate sanctions. See, e.g., Thompson v. Hous. Auth. of City of

4

L.A., 782 F.2d 829, 831 (9th Cir. 1986). Counsel shall work toward the completion of discovery

5

in this case in good faith and in careful consideration of their duties as attorneys admitted to

6

practice in the Eastern District of California. See, e.g., E.D. Cal. L.R. 180(e).

7

The parties and the Special Master will continue to work toward the production of

8

email and network files as specified in the Discovery Protocol. See Order Nov. 3, 2015, ECF No.

9

127; Discovery Protocol 8–11, ECF No. 127-1. In all other respects, the court has determined the

10

parties will not benefit from further direct coordination with the Special Master. The parties are

11

directed to restrict their communications with him to discussions about the production of email

12

and network files, as noted at the beginning of this paragraph.

13

The Special Master will continue to fulfill his role, but at this point by assisting as

14

an independent technical expert, including by assisting the assigned Magistrate Judge in any

15

discovery matter she deems requires his assistance. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 53; Order July 2, 2015,

16

ECF No. 116; Minute Order, ECF No. 124.

17

Finally, the court also has been advised that the California Department of

18

Education (CDE) and its counsel have suggested the Special Master has wasted time and that he

19

may be motivated by an improper pecuniary interest. The court previously has adopted a

20

procedure by which any party may object to any of the Special Master’s expenses as not

21

reasonably incurred or allocated. See Order Jan. 25, 2016, ECF No. 149. That procedure does

22

not provide for attempting to impugn the Special Master through direct communication with him.

23

Counsel is reminded that “[a] special master is a ‘surrogate’ of the court and in that sense the

24

service performed is an important public duty of high order in much the same way as is serving in

25

the Judiciary.” Cordoza v. Pac. States Steel Corp., 320 F.3d 989, 995 (9th Cir. 2003) (citation

26

and quotation marks omitted). Any further end runs around the orderly procedure for

27

reimbursement of the Special Master shall be addressed through appropriate sanctions.

28
2

1

Moreover, to clarify the Special Master’s role as a surrogate of the court, the

2

procedure for payment of his reasonable expenses is hereby modified to provide that upon

3

approval of his expenses by the Magistrate Judge, the party owing payment shall promptly

4

forward the funds due to the Clerk of the Court, who is directed to establish an account for this

5

purpose. The Clerk of the Court will then disburse the funds to the Special Master as approved

6

by the Magistrate Judge. The court expressly reserves the right to further modify the procedure

7

for payment of the Special Master if future circumstances call for such modification.

8
9

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 4, 2016.

10
11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3