Morgan Hill Concerned Parents Association v. California Department of Education

Filing 171

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/5/2016 SETTING a Discovery Status Conference for 5/11/2016 at 01:00 PM in Courtroom 26 (AC) before Magistrate Judge Allison Claire; ORDERING counsel for all parties to be present at said conference ; CAUTIONING all parties that telephone participation will not be permitted; ORDERING that no party file a discovery motion until after the Discovery Status Conference; ORDERING the parties to serve and file separate Status Reports by 4/27/2016 at 04:30 PM. (Michel, G.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 MORGAN HILL CONCERNED PARENTS ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 No. 2:11-cv-3471 KJM AC ORDER v. CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, et al., Defendants. 17 18 In light of the district judge’s order of April 4, 2016 (ECF No. 170), the undersigned will 19 schedule a Discovery Status Conference. The parties are cautioned that although no discovery 20 cut-off date has yet been imposed, its absence will not excuse discovery delays, nor prevent the 21 imposition of sanctions for such delays. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 1. A Discovery Status Conference is set before the undersigned, for May 11, 2016 at 1:00 24 p.m. in Courtroom 26 (8th Floor). Counsel for all parties shall be present at the conference in 25 person. Telephone participation will not be permitted for this conference. 26 2. No party shall file a discovery motion until after the Discovery Status Conference. 27 3. The parties shall serve and file separate Status Reports, not to exceed 10 pages in 28 length, no later than April 27, 2016 at 4:30 p.m., setting forth their views on the following: 1 1 2 a. The status of the production of the “Email / Network Files” discussed in the E-Discovery Protocol (ECF No. 120 at 9-12); 3 4 b. The status of the discovery regarding CALPADS under “Option 2” of the E-Discovery Protocol (ECF No. 120 at 7-8); 5 6 c. The status of the non-database discovery, including a general description of what has been propounded and what has been produced to date; 7 8 9 10 11 12 d. The value of conducting discovery in stages, and any proposals to accomplish this; e. Any discovery motions the parties currently anticipate filing, and the schedule for filing such motions; and f. Any other issue that relates to discovery in this case. DATED: April 5, 2016 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?