Gjerde v. Linderholm et al

Filing 11

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 11/7/11 ORDERING the Clerk of the Court is directed to strike all documents filed by petitioner in this action; Within 28 days, petitioner shall file with the court, and serve upon each respondent ide ntified in the caption of the petition, a petition in compliance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice. Petitioner shall file a certificate of such service within 7 days after service is made; Within 28 days after the petition is served by petitioner, respondents shall file and serve a response to the petition; Petitioner's failure to respond to this order in a timely manner may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and Respondent's 10/21/11 motion to dismiss 10 is denied as moot. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SEAN P. GJERDE dba LAW OFFICES OF SEAN P. GJERDE, 11 Petitioner, No. MISC S-11-0075 JAM DAD 12 v. 13 14 15 16 17 18 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, and DEBI LINDERHOLM, Revenue Agent, ORDER Respondents. / Petitioner, Sean P. Gjerde, is proceeding pro se with a petition to quash an 19 Internal Revenue Service summons pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 7609(b)(2). The case has been 20 referred to the undersigned U.S. Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(10). 21 Under the Local Rules of Practice, pro se parties are to file and serve paper 22 documents. Local Rule 133(a). Any person appearing pro se may not utilize electronic filing 23 unless they have been granted permission to do so by the assigned District Judge or Magistrate 24 Judge. Local Rule 133(b)(2). Attorney’s who wish to file documents in this court electronically, 25 must be admitted to practice in the Eastern District or must be admitted to appear pro hac vice. 26 Local Rule 135(g). Admission to practice in the Eastern District requires that the attorney 1 1 complete an e-filing registration form and receive a username and password. (Id.) The court 2 issued registration name and password, when utilized for electronic filing of documents, will 3 serve as the party’s signature for purposes of Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 4 (Id.) Moreover, unless an attorney opts out, registration as an electronic filer constitutes consent 5 to serve and receive service electronically pursuant to Rule 5(b)(2)(E) of the Federal Rules of 6 Civil Procedure. See Local Rule 135(g)(1). Anything filed using an attorney’s name, login, and 7 password will be deemed to have been signed by that attorney for all purposes. Local Rule 8 131(c). Attorneys are responsible for, and must take care to ensure, the validity of their 9 signatures. Local Rule 131(d). Documents filed with invalid electronic signatures may be 10 stricken. See Local Rule 131(d) & (g). Failure of counsel or of a party to comply with the Local 11 Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all 12 sanctions authorized by statue or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court. Local Rule 13 110. 14 Petitioner initiated this action on August 21, 2011, by filing his petition 15 electronically using the registration name and password of attorney James Chandler. On 16 September 8, 2011, the Clerk of the Court issued a Clerk’s Notice of Docket Correction, stating: 17 Attorney James P. Chandler filed the initiating documents on 8/21/11. All documents indicate that Mr. Gjerde is appearing pro se. Petitioner Sean P. Gjerde is an attorney, admitted to practice in the Eastern District of California and should be filing all documents electronically. No documents indicate that Mr. Chandler is attorney of record, as such, Mr. Chandler is terminated from this case. The court is in receipt of a certificate of service. The certificate of service has been filed in non-compliance with the local rules and will be filed in the case as of 9/8/11.1 18 19 20 21 22 (Doc. No. 3.) In disregard of this notice issued by the Clerk of the Court, petitioner has 23 ///// 24 25 26 1 The certificate of service was filed on September 8, 2011, pursuant to Local Rule 5133(d)(3), which provides that the Clerk will not refuse to file a document that is submitted for filing in a pending action. 2 1 continued to file documents electronically using the registration name and password of attorney 2 James Chandler. See Doc. Nos. 6 & 7. 3 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 4 1. The Clerk of the Court is directed to strike all documents filed by petitioner in 5 this action; 6 2. Within 28 days, petitioner shall file with the court, and serve upon each 7 respondent identified in the caption of the petition, a petition in compliance with the Federal 8 Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local Rules of Practice. Petitioner shall file a certificate of 9 such service within 7 days after service is made; 10 11 3. Within 28 days after the petition is served by petitioner, respondents shall file and serve a response to the petition; 12 4. If respondents’ response to the petition is an answer, a reply shall be filed by 13 petitioner within 14 days after the response is filed. Any party may request oral argument by 14 including the request in the answer or reply. If no request for oral argument is made, the petition 15 to quash will be submitted on the papers upon the completion of briefing; 16 5. If respondents’ response to the petition is a motion, the motion shall be noticed 17 for hearing before the undersigned on a regularly scheduled law and motion calendar and shall be 18 briefed and heard in accordance with Local Rule 230; 19 20 6. Petitioner’s failure to respond to this order in a timely manner may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed; and 21 7. Respondent’s October 21, 2011 motion to dismiss (Doc. No. 10) is denied as 22 moot. 23 DATED: November 7, 2011. 24 25 DAD:6 ddad1\orders.prose\gjerde0075.strike 26 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?