United States of America v. Approximately $11,400.00 in U.S. Currency

Filing 4

ORDER signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 2/15/12 ORDERING the parties agree that the deadline by which the United States shall be required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture shall be extended to May 17, 2012. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U.S. Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 12 Plaintiff, v. 13 14 APPROXIMATELY $11,400.00 IN U.S. CURRENCY, 15 Defendant. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:11-MC-00095-MCE-GGH STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME FOR FILING A COMPLAINT FOR FORFEITURE AND/OR TO OBTAIN AN INDICTMENT ALLEGING FORFEITURE It is hereby stipulated by and between the United States of 17 18 America and claimant Alex Herrera ("claimant"), by and through his 19 attorney, as follows: 1. 20 On or about September 20, 2011, claimant Alex Herrera 21 filed a claim in the administrative forfeiture proceedings with the 22 Federal Bureau of Investigation with respect to the Approximately 23 $11,400.00 in U.S. Currency (hereafter the "defendant currency"), 24 which was seized on July 12, 2011. 2. 25 The Federal Bureau of Investigation has sent the written 26 notice of intent to forfeit required by 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(1)(A) to 27 all known interested parties. 28 /// 1 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time 1 The time has expired for any person to file a claim to the 2 defendant currency under 18 U.S.C. 3 § 983(a)(2)(A)-(E), and no person other than the claimant has filed 4 a claim to the defendant currency as required by law in the 5 administrative forfeiture proceeding. 6 3. Under 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the United States is 7 required to file a complaint for forfeiture against the defendant 8 currency and/or to obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant 9 currency is subject to forfeiture within 90 days after a claim has 10 been filed in the administrative forfeiture proceedings, unless the 11 court extends the deadline for good cause shown or by agreement of 12 the parties. 13 4. That deadline was December 21, 2011. By Stipulation and Order filed on or about November 4, 14 2011, the parties stipulated to extend to February 17, 2012, the 15 time in which the United States is required to file a civil 16 complaint for forfeiture against the defendant funds and/or to 17 obtain an indictment alleging that the defendant funds are subject 18 to forfeiture. 19 5. As provided in 18 U.S.C. § 983(a)(3)(A), the parties wish 20 by agreement to extend to May 17, 2012, the time in which the 21 United States is required to file a civil complaint for forfeiture 22 against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an indictment 23 alleging that the defendant currency is subject to forfeiture. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time 1 6. Accordingly, the parties agree that the deadline by which 2 the United States shall be required to file a complaint for 3 forfeiture against the defendant currency and/or to obtain an 4 indictment alleging that the defendant currency is subject to 5 forfeiture shall be extended to May 17, 2012. 6 7 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 8 9 DATE: 02/10/12 /s/ Kevin C. Khasigian KEVIN C. KHASIGIAN Assistant U.S. Attorney DATE: 2/9/2012 /s/ Jesse Santana JESSE SANTANA Attorney for Claimant Alex Herrera (Signature retained by Attorney) 10 11 12 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. 16 17 Dated: February 15, 2012 18 19 _____________________________ MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 Stipulation and Order to Extend Time

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?