Watts v. Hicks et al
Filing
21
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/21/2013 GRANTING plaintiff's 20 motion for leave to amend ; and plaintiff has 30 days to file a second amended complaint. (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
PHILLIP WATTS,
12
No. 2:12-cv-0010 CKD P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
D. HICKS, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Before the court is plaintiff’s July 25, 2013 motion for leave to amend. (ECF No. 20.) As
18
19
plaintiff has made a showing that he has new information as to the identities of certain
20
defendants, plaintiff will be granted leave to file a second amended complaint within thirty days
21
of service of this order.1 No further extensions of time will be granted. (See ECF No. 18.)
22
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
23
1. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend (ECF No. 20) is granted; and
24
////
25
1
26
27
Local Rule 220 requires that an amended complaint be complete in itself without reference to
any prior pleading. Therefore, in an amended complaint, as in an original complaint, each claim
and the involvement of each defendant must be sufficiently alleged. Furthermore, any amended
complaint shall not include allegations unrelated to the claims that are the subject of this action.
28
1
1
2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from service of this order in which to file a second
2
amended complaint.
3
Dated: August 21, 2013
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
8
9
2 / watt0010.amend
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?