Watts v. Hicks et al

Filing 21

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/21/2013 GRANTING plaintiff's 20 motion for leave to amend ; and plaintiff has 30 days to file a second amended complaint. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PHILLIP WATTS, 12 No. 2:12-cv-0010 CKD P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 D. HICKS, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 17 Before the court is plaintiff’s July 25, 2013 motion for leave to amend. (ECF No. 20.) As 18 19 plaintiff has made a showing that he has new information as to the identities of certain 20 defendants, plaintiff will be granted leave to file a second amended complaint within thirty days 21 of service of this order.1 No further extensions of time will be granted. (See ECF No. 18.) 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 23 1. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend (ECF No. 20) is granted; and 24 //// 25 1 26 27 Local Rule 220 requires that an amended complaint be complete in itself without reference to any prior pleading. Therefore, in an amended complaint, as in an original complaint, each claim and the involvement of each defendant must be sufficiently alleged. Furthermore, any amended complaint shall not include allegations unrelated to the claims that are the subject of this action. 28 1 1 2. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from service of this order in which to file a second 2 amended complaint. 3 Dated: August 21, 2013 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 / watt0010.amend 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?