Rhodes v. Sutter Health et al

Filing 185

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 6/7/2013 ORDERING Plaintiff's 173 motion to compel is GRANTED; Defendant Sutter Gould Medical Foundation shall produce the amended answers to the requests for admissions at issue to plaintiff&# 039;s counsel by midnight on 6/10/2013; Defendant Gould Medical Group's 175 motion to compel is GRANTED as to Requests for Admission Numbers 35 and 60, and as to Special Interrogatories Numbers 7 and 10, and DENIED as to Request for Admission Number 61 and Special Interrogatories Numbers 14 and 19; Plaintiff shall produce the amended responses to counsel for Gould Medical Group by midnight on 6/12/2013; and Plaintiff's counsel shall also provide verifications as to all discovery responses ordered herein, and as to any recently supplemented discovery responses that were produced without verifications, by midnight on 6/12/2013. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

BETH A. RHODES, M.D.,

11

Plaintiff,

12
13
14
15

No. 2:12-cv-0013 WBS DAD

v.
SUTTER HEALTH, a California
corporation, SUTTER GOULD
MEDICAL FOUNDATION, a California
corporation, THE GOULD MEDICAL
GROUP, INC., a California
corporation,

ORDER

16
17

Defendants.

18

/

19

This matter came before the court on June 7, 2013, for hearing of plaintiff’s

20

motion to compel (Doc. No. 173) and defendant Gould Medical Group’s motion to compel (Doc.

21

No. 175). Stephen Purtill, Esq. appeared telephonically on behalf of plaintiff. Benjamin

22

Schnayerson, Esq. appeared on behalf of defendant Gould Medical Group, Inc., and Maiko

23

Nakarai-Kanivas, Esq. appeared on behalf of defendant Sutter Gould Medical Foundation.

24

Upon consideration of the parties’ arguments on file and at the hearing, and for the reasons set

25

forth in detail on the record, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

26

/////
1

1

1. Plaintiff’s May 17, 2013 motion to compel (Doc. No. 173), is granted;

2

2. Defendant Sutter Gould Medical Foundation shall produce the amended

3

answers to the requests for admissions at issue to plaintiff’s counsel by midnight on June 10,

4

2013;

5

3. Defendant Gould Medical Group’s May 17, 2013 motion to compel (Doc. No.

6

175) is granted as to Requests for Admission Numbers 35 and 60, and as to Special

7

Interrogatories Numbers 7 and 10, and denied as to Request for Admission Number 61 and

8

Special Interrogatories Numbers 14 and 19;

9
10
11

4. Plaintiff shall produce the amended responses to counsel for Gould Medical
Group by midnight on June 12, 2013; and
5. Plaintiff’s counsel shall also provide verifications as to all discovery responses

12

ordered herein, and as to any recently supplemented discovery responses that were produced

13

without verifications, by midnight on June 12, 2013.

14

DATED: June 7, 2013.

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.civil\rhodes0013.oah.060713

22
23
24
25
26
2