McMurtry v. Hu, et al

Filing 54

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/29/2015 ORDERING plaintiff to file and serve, within 30 days, an oppostition or statement of no opposition to the pending 52 motion for summary judgment. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHARLEY McMURTRY, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 v. No. 2:12-cv-00103 JAM DAD P ORDER HU, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On August 21, 2015, defendants filed and served a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. (ECF No. 52.) 21 Pursuant to the Local Rules of this court, plaintiff’s opposition or statement of non- 22 opposition was due within 21 days after service of the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. 23 See Local Rule 230(l). More than 21 days have passed, and plaintiff has not opposed the motion 24 or otherwise communicated with the court. 25 On April 1, 2013, plaintiff was advised of the requirements for filing an opposition to a 26 motion for summary judgment, and informed that his failure to oppose such motion may be 27 deemed a waiver of opposition thereto. (See ECF No. 18.) See Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 28 957 (9th Cir. 1998) (en banc), and Klingele v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409, 411-12 (9th Cir. 1988). 1 The order filed April 1, 2013, also advised plaintiff that failure to comply with the Local Rules 2 may result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. 3 Local Rule 230(l) provides that failure to timely respond to a motion may be deemed a 4 waiver of opposition. See Local Rule 230(l).1 In addition, Local Rule 110 provides that failure to 5 comply with the Local Rules or any order of this court “may be grounds for imposition of any and 6 all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court.” Finally, 7 Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, authorizes the involuntary dismissal of an action 8 due to a plaintiff’s failure to prosecute, or to comply with the Federal Rules or a court order. 9 Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within 30 days after the filing 10 date of this order, plaintiff shall file and serve an opposition, or statement of no opposition, to the 11 pending motion for summary judgment. Failure to timely file an opposition, or statement of no 12 opposition, will be deemed as plaintiff’s consent to have this action dismissed for lack of 13 prosecution, failure to abide by a court order, and failure to comply with the Local Rules and 14 Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Accordingly, plaintiff is forewarned that his failure to file the 15 documents required by this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed 16 without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). 17 Dated: October 29, 2015 18 19 20 DAD:10 mcmu0103.nooppo.2nd 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Local Rule 230(l) provides in pertinent part: Opposition, if any, to the granting of the motion shall be served and filed by the responding party not more than twenty-one (21), days after the date of service of the motion. A responding party who has no opposition to the granting of the motion shall serve and file a statement to that effect, specifically designating the motion in question. Failure of the responding party to file an opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?